Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
26. I am surprised that this story surprises other posters.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 10:08 AM
Apr 2014

Clarence Thomas survived his confirmation hearings and now sits on the Supreme Court, right? Nine top legal jobs in a nation of about 350 million people though less at that time) and he got one of them--after the Hill passed a lie detector test.

Anita Hill had not volunteered to testify. In the course of the government's doing diligence on Thomas, however, one of the women interviewed mentioned that anyone investigating Thomas should speak to Anita Hill, so they did.

Anita Hill had been a very credible witness. Other women corroborated her claims by tales of how Thomas had behaved toward then. Thomas made no attempt to refute a single one of her allegations, instead lashing out at the proceedings. Clarence Thomas was also evaluated as the second least qualified SCOTUS nominee in modern time. (The first was Sandra Day O'Connor, who was graduated from law school when women could only get jobs as legal secretaries--which she did, but before affirmative action. Thomas, on the other hand, had had the benefit of affirmative action throughout.)

Media goaded both Hill and Thomas about taking a lie detector test. Thomas, of course, did not take one. Hill did.

On Sunday, October 14, 1991, Anita Hill's representative announced that she had passed a lie detector test that week, given by a man who had worked with the FBI. The test included the subject matter of her allegations about Thomas. Those facts were immediate and widely reported by media--a media whose message is much less diluted than today's media. On Monday, October 15, 1991, the Senate confirmed.

Granted, the margin was narrow, but the vote was along party lines, so who knows what accounted for that. Bottom line, Thomas got to be one of nine humans in the U.S. with the final say over things like sexual harassment in the workplace.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wow CFLDem Apr 2014 #1
It is shocking and aslo sadly unsurprising. redqueen Apr 2014 #2
one self kick redqueen Apr 2014 #3
I see your one self kick and raise it to two yuiyoshida Apr 2014 #13
"Girls believe the myth that men can’t help it." leftstreet Apr 2014 #4
Depressing indeed. redqueen Apr 2014 #6
K&R Solly Mack Apr 2014 #5
Not surprising at all. laundry_queen Apr 2014 #7
Same here, redqueen Apr 2014 #9
Yep. Nobody told girls when we were young to NOT ACCEPT IT and stand up for ourselves. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2014 #8
This stuff is still practically invisible to most people. redqueen Apr 2014 #10
I tried to ignore it. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2014 #11
I had a sales guy do the same at one of my first jobs. redqueen Apr 2014 #12
I have it when married men hit on me. They seem to have this feeling of entitlement. :puke: nt raccoon Apr 2014 #28
K&R JoeyT Apr 2014 #14
The first time I had to deal with harassment at school was in eighth grade. LeftyMom Apr 2014 #15
Oooh, that sounds familiar. KitSileya Apr 2014 #19
Well... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #16
"Nobody should be surprised by the OP... redqueen Apr 2014 #25
I'm going to talk to my young teen daughter tonight and explicitly restate Arugula Latte Apr 2014 #17
That's so important to do. redqueen Apr 2014 #27
This.. one_voice Apr 2014 #18
I'm sorry that happened to you. KitSileya Apr 2014 #20
It is also to show us that we "have no right" to move freely in tblue37 Apr 2014 #22
Exactly. It is a part of male privilege that men do to create an advantage for themselves. KitSileya Apr 2014 #24
You should consider making this an OP! nt raccoon Apr 2014 #29
I admit that in this, KitSileya Apr 2014 #30
pretty much. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2014 #37
I have been through similar. Behind the Aegis Apr 2014 #21
you are correct; "cat calls" and such are meant to harass and intimidate, primarily. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2014 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2014 #23
I am surprised that this story surprises other posters. merrily Apr 2014 #26
yep; i remember how anita hill was skewered for daring to speak the truth. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2014 #35
At 42 I am still shocked at times. Rex Apr 2014 #31
It's a crisis almost all over the world. redqueen Apr 2014 #32
I didn't really believe such opposition existed until I read all the links Rex Apr 2014 #33
absolutely true. kids need to be taught from a young age that this stuff is unacceptable, and TheFrenchRazor Apr 2014 #34
Serious consequences? redqueen Apr 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Report: Many girls view s...»Reply #26