It is a stupid thing to elect somebody because you think it is "their turn".

[el_bryanto]

9. I don't know if this is in relation to Hillary Clinton or in reference to switching

which political party holds office regularly.

If it's in relationship to Hillary Clinton - I think the argument is more that she has experience and has served the Democratic party loyally for years, and the party should reward her loyalty and service, and recognize her experience by giving her the chance to run. That's not an argument I buy (because I think we should have a more liberal candidate), but it's understandable.

If it's in relation to changing parties - it's pretty goofy, like the argument for divided government. It might well make sense for a party who favors change in one house and a party who wants to limit change in the other, but the Republicans these days are so far round the bend, I can't understand thinking that you can have any balance with them.

Bryant