General Discussion

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)

31. It will be hidden almost every time it is used.

Reply to gcomeau (Reply #30)

Thu Apr 17, 2014, 05:08 PM

Apr 2014

It is one of the "forbidden words" on DU. You should know that by now.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

167 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Calif. TV station films dog calmly playing with kids after cop shoots himself trying to kill it [View all] warrior1 Apr 2014 OP

Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #1

You're blaming the mother?... TeeYiYi Apr 2014 #4

just use sunnystarr Apr 2014 #8

That would work. ..nt TeeYiYi Apr 2014 #11

You are spot on lillypaddle Apr 2014 #66

Please don't be asinine Hayduke Bomgarte Apr 2014 #19

Calling someone a "son of a bitch" is actually insulting his mother. cyberswede Apr 2014 #48

It's ridiculous lillypaddle Apr 2014 #67

The MRAs? CFLDem Apr 2014 #76

No, the word jumpers Warpy Apr 2014 #152

"bitch", hunh? What do you have against women? Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #132

What exactly... gcomeau Apr 2014 #23

You'll probably soon find out. nt oldhippie Apr 2014 #24

I wait in breathless anticipation.... -nt gcomeau Apr 2014 #25

I'm surprised it took that long oldhippie Apr 2014 #28

4 people actually voted to hide *that*? gcomeau Apr 2014 #30

It will be hidden almost every time it is used. oldhippie Apr 2014 #31

I actually had never encountered that before. gcomeau Apr 2014 #32

Can I get the list of all the words James48 Apr 2014 #33

Seconded. AngryDem001 Apr 2014 #36

If you get the list from the P C police, would B Calm Apr 2014 #54

I've tried to get a list of the forbidden words, but .... oldhippie Apr 2014 #71

It IS Bullshit. AngryDem001 Apr 2014 #34

dick is also a word that is acceptable frylock Apr 2014 #37

and bastard itsrobert Apr 2014 #40

How so? cyberswede Apr 2014 #47

My first take was that the poster thinks all assholes are men. ;-) DesertDiamond Apr 2014 #53

I wonder why pintobean Apr 2014 #99

Really... Agschmid Apr 2014 #104

That's usually my reaction pintobean Apr 2014 #107

Bitch is what we call a female dog. IT is by necessity sexist as is "Dog" "COW" "Steer" and "BULL" Vincardog Apr 2014 #137

The poster to whom I replied suggested a double standard between "bitch" ans "asshole" cyberswede Apr 2014 #140

"dog"? Which sex does that refer to? Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #141

The kind that breeds bitches. Vincardog Apr 2014 #142

"dog" is not gender (sex) specific. "bitch" is sex specific. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #143

The male sex is generally recognize as the inclusive term for the species. Dog is sex specific Vincardog Apr 2014 #144

"stud" is male specific. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #145

The "inclusive = male" assumption is at root of patriarchy & the idea that females don't count. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #146

You are picking a fight where there is none. Vincardog Apr 2014 #148

Good. "Son of a bitch" is a sexist remark. Glad we agree. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #149

Do people really need this explained to them? TorchTheWitch Apr 2014 #84

Yes, they do need this explained to them. As many times as necessary. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #147

You do not see the difference between a sexist slur and an anus? uppityperson Apr 2014 #122

forbidden by whom? lillypaddle Apr 2014 #68

Awww... Sheldon Cooper Apr 2014 #70

Unless you are describing legal firarm owners, it can be used there with no problems. n/t oneshooter Apr 2014 #69

I used a much less derogatory term once and got a post hidden BuelahWitch Apr 2014 #63

It is a sexist slur. n/t whopis01 Apr 2014 #111

Oh please... gcomeau Apr 2014 #121

It's sexist because you never see "son of a dick" as an insult. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #134

Umm, think that through. There's a pretty ridiculously obvious reason... gcomeau Apr 2014 #156

Yes, read your post. However we DO live in the 21st century where "bitch" is an insult referring ... Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #157

Yes, the use of the word *on it's own* as an epithet... gcomeau Apr 2014 #161

Maybe for you lillypaddle Apr 2014 #64

You have offenend me oneofthe99 Apr 2014 #77

Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #98

Instant karma! WhiteTara Apr 2014 #2

Without doubt n/t etherealtruth Apr 2014 #50

Absolutely. 840high Apr 2014 #62

"Instant karma's gonna get you, gonna knock you off your feet..." n/t nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #81

yep eom noiretextatique Apr 2014 #138

No kidding. Warpy Apr 2014 #153

JUSTICE FOR THE DOOFUS leftyohiolib Apr 2014 #3

Glad the dog is ok...don't really care about this asshole joeybee12 Apr 2014 #5

Crap atreides1 Apr 2014 #6

I can firmly say Aerows Apr 2014 #7

Suck it, you piece of shit cop PeaceNikki Apr 2014 #9

Think of the children Politicalboi Apr 2014 #12

Uh, that's still a pretty big dog. louis-t Apr 2014 #14

that is a medium sized dog nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #89

Incompetence on so many levels. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #10

karma Liberal_in_LA Apr 2014 #13

Was the deputy's name Barney? hobbit709 Apr 2014 #15

Earnest T I think. (nm) Elwood P Dowd Apr 2014 #41

That is exactly what I was thinking cate94 Apr 2014 #51

Yup! Was thinking KARMA directed the bullet! n/t hue Apr 2014 #16

Instant Karma's gonna get you AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #17

Dog - 1 / Trigger-happy Coward - 0 Tom Ripley Apr 2014 #18

Maybe Deputy donco Apr 2014 #20

One bullet and he's got to carry it in his breast pocket. notadmblnd Apr 2014 #29

What's with the Jayhawker? KansDem Apr 2014 #21

Stop shooting our children and dogs. Disarm the cops. marble falls Apr 2014 #22

reminds me of a vid... canuckledragger Apr 2014 #26

lol. nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #94

Well done! 2naSalit Apr 2014 #128

Sounds about right -nt Bonx Apr 2014 #27

The cop should be cited for endangering the lives of the children. hue Apr 2014 #35

Seems to me that the bullet found it's proper home. 99Forever Apr 2014 #38

gee, who would ever expect a dog to agressively charge a stranger that just entered their yard? frylock Apr 2014 #39

There is no "Stand Your Ground" for dogs. Nine Apr 2014 #58

does that include the backyard, while i'm at work? frylock Apr 2014 #60

Well, let's look at what the law is in CA, where this story took place. Nine Apr 2014 #73

Inapplicable. mbperrin Apr 2014 #87

And barking to announce a stranger passiveporcupine Apr 2014 #136

You don't know the dog was only barking and not charging. Nine Apr 2014 #166

It's not inapplicable to frylock's scenario, which is what I was responding to. (nt) Nine Apr 2014 #165

ah. well there you have it. police can kill your family pet with impunity.. frylock Apr 2014 #127

No, it simply means the officer can't be considered a trespasser. Nine Apr 2014 #164

Because a dog has the cognitive abilities to recognize Depity Fife by his uniform alone, obviously. baldguy Apr 2014 #74

For Pete's sake... Nine Apr 2014 #78

Once again, not the slightest bit of evidence that this dog attacked anyone. mbperrin Apr 2014 #88

your hypothetical is just silly noiretextatique Apr 2014 #139

From the article etherealtruth Apr 2014 #158

I don't know why everyone keeps arguing with me about this. Nine Apr 2014 #162

You are right you did NOT assert that the dog actually "charged" or attacked the cop etherealtruth Apr 2014 #163

No evidence this dog attacked anybody, period. mbperrin Apr 2014 #85

The attack is presumed in the hypothetical we're discussing here. Nine Apr 2014 #100

Was the self inflicted wound also hypothetical? You offer fiction where facts are known Dragonfli Apr 2014 #130

I'm not talking hypothetical. I'm talking actual events. mbperrin Apr 2014 #131

all is well that ends well nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #42

Deputy Dumbass Gets His Due mbperrin Apr 2014 #43

Isn't there something in cop training about ... harun Apr 2014 #44

Maybe after they stitch him up, a can of Alpo might ease his pain.....idiot...that's all he deserves bkanderson76 Apr 2014 #45

Won't anyone step up to defend this brave officer? Warren Stupidity Apr 2014 #46

+1 nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #82

Truth is, a far greater percentage of people are shitty mbperrin Apr 2014 #90

Yay cops! bravenak Apr 2014 #49

every cop shooting dog case is found justified. the police have to. Garion_55 Apr 2014 #52

Dumb ass. OnyxCollie Apr 2014 #55

Focusing on the awesome owner chowder66 Apr 2014 #56

I agree! StarryNite Apr 2014 #150

So a dog can never be aggressive at one point in time and unaggressive at another time? Nine Apr 2014 #57

I don't know if it was the aggressor either. ohnoyoudidnt Apr 2014 #59

A cop serving an eviction notice is allowed to enter a property uninvited. (nt) Nine Apr 2014 #72

So is a letter carrier pintobean Apr 2014 #102

No, just for getting attacked by them. (nt) Nine Apr 2014 #103

They are armed pintobean Apr 2014 #105

"a dog doing what dogs are suppose to do"!? Nine Apr 2014 #108

You go ahead and keep defending this incompetent boob. pintobean Apr 2014 #110

while you defend the concept that dogs are supposed to attack people (nt) Nine Apr 2014 #112

I did no such thing. pintobean Apr 2014 #115

Your words: Nine Apr 2014 #119

Shooting himself in the leg would indicate panic. pintobean Apr 2014 #124

The dog also doesn't know the difference between a child molester and a deliveryperson. Nine Apr 2014 #126

The evidence is right in front of your eyes, the dog did not attack the idiot Dragonfli Apr 2014 #129

Thank you. mbperrin Apr 2014 #160

Are you assuming that the officer knew the dog was there before he entered the property? mbperrin Apr 2014 #133

How many of those 10 die, so that lethal force against the dogs would have been justified? mbperrin Apr 2014 #135

Not on DU no Egnever Apr 2014 #61

Barking at a knock on the door isn't really attacking, is it? mbperrin Apr 2014 #92

No but it is agressive behavior Egnever Apr 2014 #93

Well, maybe the dumbass should lose his job for shooting himself? Or are you also defending his..... Logical Apr 2014 #79

Glock Perfection! Adrahil Apr 2014 #118

Maybe he's simply not smart enough, or enough in control of his temper, to be a cop. nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #83

Never owned or been around dogs at all, have you? mbperrin Apr 2014 #91

I don't know what the time lapse was. Nine Apr 2014 #95

Your defense of authority is noted. TBF Apr 2014 #96

? Nine Apr 2014 #101

If you've ever been around dogs you'd know TBF Apr 2014 #106

Ha ha. "Diplomacy." Nine Apr 2014 #109

You don't even know what "pack" means. pintobean Apr 2014 #113

I know that you have admitted to having dogs you can't control. (nt) Nine Apr 2014 #114

That's the 2nd false accusation you've made against me. pintobean Apr 2014 #116

Sorry, I thought I was still talking to TBF. (nt) Nine Apr 2014 #117

Oh, so you meant to insult me instead? TBF Apr 2014 #120

Barney, is that you? nt lillypaddle Apr 2014 #65

Precious is a *good* dog, and deserves all the hugs & kisses & cuddles & cookies she can get. baldguy Apr 2014 #75

In other police and dog news... PoliticAverse Apr 2014 #80

Nearly a Darwin Award by this cop. nt alp227 Apr 2014 #86

Have they arrested the dog's owner for attempted murder on the cop, yet? TransitJohn Apr 2014 #97

Curious as to what the dog looks like, making a guess before reading article. uppityperson Apr 2014 #123

You know what upsets me? So many people in the U.S.A. don't truly have homes. hunter Apr 2014 #125

Standards for law enforcement are way too low tabasco Apr 2014 #151

Fucking cop! gopiscrap Apr 2014 #154

If I find this amusing, does that make me a bad person? stage left Apr 2014 #155

Riiigghhtt JJChambers Apr 2014 #159

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2014 #167