Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(98,466 posts)
25. Thanks jeff....
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 12:33 AM
Apr 2014

and more white privilege.

Why Do Christian Right-Wingers Pretend America's Laws Don't Apply to Them?

Conservatives are demanding special rights to disobey universally applicable federal laws.

The situation with Cliven Bundy of Nevada should be a no-brainer for people from both the left and the right. Bundy has been stealing from the taxpayers for years, illegally grazing his cattle on federal lands while refusing to pay for the privilege. Both liberals and conservatives pay taxes, so such blatant theft should outrage everyone equally. Indeed, conservative media claims to take theft from taxpayers very seriously, with Fox News spending so much time on the miniscule problem of food stamp cheats that the number of minutes spent on it has likely long ago exceeded the number of pennies lost to this non-problem.

Bundy has stolen far more than any hypothetical food stamp cheat ever did, but when the government tried to show up and take what was theirs, he met them with armed resistance, pushing him from the “ordinary fraud” category to the “violent criminal” column.

And yet, for some reason, Bundy’s outrageous theft of services from the taxpayers is not being taken seriously by the right-wing press. As Roy Edroso of Village Voice and Eric Boehlert of Media Matters have chronicled, the conservative response to the whole incident has ranged from minimizing the seriousness of the crime to outright cheering Bundy on in his efforts to use the threat of violence to continue stealing from the taxpayers.

It’s tempting to write this reaction off as a matter of idiocy married to identity politics. Bundy is a white guy in a cowboy hat wielding guns, which reads as “one of us” to many on the right, so they refuse to accept that he’s a bad guy no matter how much he threatens violence against federal officers simply for enforcing a law that applies to everyone. And no doubt that is part of what’s going on here. But really, what’s going on runs deeper than a knee-jerk desire on the part of the right to believe every white guy in a cowboy hat is a good guy. This is the logical extension of a push that’s grown in recent years from conservatives to argue that they, and only they, have special rights to simply disregard any law they don’t want to follow. And unfortunately that’s an argument that may be making headway this year in the Supreme Court.

http://www.alternet.org/belief/why-do-christian-right-wingers-pretend-americas-laws-dont-apply-them

Yes it is white privilege.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Fear of a Black Gun Owner steve2470 Apr 2014 #1
This has become scary steve. sheshe2 Apr 2014 #6
"I agree, sheshe, the black gun toters would either be dead or in jail already." AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #10
it's not necessarily race bossy22 Apr 2014 #2
No, it's not about media coverage. sheshe2 Apr 2014 #3
+1. Race is the basis for it all. Paladin Apr 2014 #4
Your skin color AgingAmerican Apr 2014 #7
Right wing terrorism and the gun nuts sheshe2 Apr 2014 #24
I would call them AgingAmerican Apr 2014 #35
Oy ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #47
It's all race.. HipChick Apr 2014 #5
+1 ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #46
yeah, it's more like republican privilege to me Doctor_J Apr 2014 #8
Exactly. LittleBlue Apr 2014 #11
It's absolutely race. jeff47 Apr 2014 #12
LOL. It's ALWAYS about race. No other explainations, ever. All about race. All the time. Skip Intro Apr 2014 #14
So what is it all about Skip? sheshe2 Apr 2014 #19
maybe not always, but sometimes Supersedeas Apr 2014 #38
because slavery of black people was legal for almost half our history CreekDog Apr 2014 #42
I don't doubt there's a disparity.....but as I factually pointed out on the other thread..... AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #9
Apparently you don't know the difference between "opinion" and "fact". (nt) jeff47 Apr 2014 #13
I do, Jeff. But with all due respect..... AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #17
Here, lemme fix that for you jeff47 Apr 2014 #20
Exactly. There's no way to appease racists without flat-out refusing to discuss racism. nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #22
I'm not refusing to discuss racism, though(where did that come from?). And that's the problem. nt AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #27
So it can be discussed, but it can't be discussed in a certain specific way because nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #31
That IS part of the problem, yes. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #32
See post #33. And keep in mind I'm *not* including you personally under "idiot white people." n/t nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #34
I can appreciate that. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #36
Thanks jeff.... sheshe2 Apr 2014 #25
...... AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #26
Yes, it is what you are trying to do. jeff47 Apr 2014 #39
"You are searching for a term that would be less offensive to the right." AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #43
You're entitled to your opinion on the subject, but like the man said, opinions aren't fact. n/t nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #21
True, but they can be backed up by facts. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #28
Frankly I have no interest in coddling ignorant, entitled fools. Not when the subject at hand nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #33
You logic completely fails ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #48
"I would put forward that you simply do not understand it." And you are entitled to that opinion. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #49
Meh misread the article Egnever Apr 2014 #15
Exactly.. butterfly77 Apr 2014 #16
More than one thing going on here, but yes, race is definitely one of them. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #18
No doubt about that, TBH. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #30
This ^^ absolutely Egnever Apr 2014 #37
time to get tough with right wing fanatics joe_stampingbull Apr 2014 #23
"They do not own America. They are not patriots." Seconded! They're not "patriots" at all. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #29
why couldn't they just use drones against these white folk? RandoLoodie Apr 2014 #40
Here we go again. For those who insist on denying white privilege Solomon Apr 2014 #41
Harry Reid is right ... napkinz Apr 2014 #44
As always napkinz, well done sheshe2 Apr 2014 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Disturbing Reality of...»Reply #25