Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Disturbing Reality of White Privilege [View all]AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)26. ......
See, the basis of your argument is your definition of privilege. Your definition is not the only one.
The problem is, Not every white person is on the same exact level, and gets the exact same respect from society as a whole. A poor white person, for example, isn't nearly as likely to get away with a light sentence on a drunk driving charge as a wealthy athlete or politician who happens to be black, or Latino, or whatever, despite whatever *social* disadvantages compared to the norm the latter may have faced; because the latter man's wealth gives him protection that the poverty stricken fellow wouldn't.
When we flee from the right's terminology battle, we are surrendering the field to them. There is no magic term that will make the right agree. They are turning to terminology in the hope that people will waste their time arguing about the exactly perfect word to use, instead of actually fighting them.
But that's not what we're trying to do. And this isn't about the right, Jeff; many of them can't be saved by our efforts alone. It's about those people on the fence.......those are the ones that can and need to be, woken up, by and large. And special snowflaking over who has the least "privilege", etc. sure as hell isn't helping us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"I agree, sheshe, the black gun toters would either be dead or in jail already."
AverageJoe90
Apr 2014
#10
LOL. It's ALWAYS about race. No other explainations, ever. All about race. All the time.
Skip Intro
Apr 2014
#14
I don't doubt there's a disparity.....but as I factually pointed out on the other thread.....
AverageJoe90
Apr 2014
#9
Exactly. There's no way to appease racists without flat-out refusing to discuss racism.
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#22
I'm not refusing to discuss racism, though(where did that come from?). And that's the problem. nt
AverageJoe90
Apr 2014
#27
So it can be discussed, but it can't be discussed in a certain specific way because
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#31
See post #33. And keep in mind I'm *not* including you personally under "idiot white people." n/t
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#34
You're entitled to your opinion on the subject, but like the man said, opinions aren't fact. n/t
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#21
Frankly I have no interest in coddling ignorant, entitled fools. Not when the subject at hand
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#33
"I would put forward that you simply do not understand it." And you are entitled to that opinion.
AverageJoe90
Apr 2014
#49
More than one thing going on here, but yes, race is definitely one of them. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2014
#18
"They do not own America. They are not patriots." Seconded! They're not "patriots" at all.
AverageJoe90
Apr 2014
#29