General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: do you believe there was a historical figure the Jesus story was built on? [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)what you have there is repeated citiations that "scholars are not putting forth assertions that he did NOT exist" which is not the same thing as agreeing he DID.
Proving a negative is a giant pain in the ass.
The fact is, the "historical existence of Jesus" is really of only a concern to Biblical historians, a group which has a vested interest in the Bible as a historical source, for obvious reasons.
There is no credible* evidence for a historical Jesus outside of the Bible, so non-biblical historians don't generally weigh in on the topic, in addition to not wanting to poke their head out of that particular foxhole and draw fire for a debate which has essentially no point outside of "Biblical History" circles.
Obviously, additional non-biblical evidence would or could change that situation, but that's how it stands. If "historians (non-Biblical) agree he existed", they're not doing so on the basis of any actual evidence.
*The Josephus account is widely believed to be a forgery created several centuries after the start of Christianity, for a number of reasons including the glaring narrative problems contained therein.