General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)because from reading this thread I can see you are not movable from this disastrous position. If you accept that wars will still happen but you think that causing more, and more widespread, suffering from war will produce good results, then you have completely lost the plot.
At least most people who suffer from the illusion of involuntary servitude think that compulsory service will prevent war. I disagree with, but can at least understand the idealism of, that notion. What I can't understand is how you can sit there and say, yeah it won't prevent war but at least all the bloodshed will affect more families. And your goal? A shorter war than the DECADE we've spent in Iraq. So still wars, no less death and mayhem, and only Vietnam-length bloodbaths fought by conscripted non-soldiers. And you ask why that's a bad idea. Merde.