General Discussion

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)

31. they occupied with the intent to disrupt

Sun Apr 20, 2014, 01:17 AM

Apr 2014

To protest injustices.... and did a lot of damage to the sites where they were at.

I dont like to throw around sedition accuations as our protests can be equally labeled as such......

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

106 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Justice Commits Sedition By Telling People to Revolt Over Income Taxes [View all] CatWoman Apr 2014 OP

Sounds like Fat Tony's losing it Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2014 #1

Rachel Maddow once called Scalia a Troll. The guy on the internet who says shit KittyWampus Apr 2014 #46

awe man we must elect a dem in 16 arely staircase Apr 2014 #2

The key word that keeps him from being prosecuted is TexasTowelie Apr 2014 #3

Thomas Piketty, in his new book, ... JEFF9K Apr 2014 #4

Is That In Impeachable Offense ??? - Remember These ??? WillyT Apr 2014 #5

Yeah, perhaps you should lead the charge, asshole. Cha Apr 2014 #6

Jury results. pintobean Apr 2014 #59

I agree..it was aimed at Tony. pangaia Apr 2014 #81

Yeah, it was named at scalia.. I would never make a personal attack of calling someone an Cha Apr 2014 #84

Funny, I have been accused of a lack of reading skills here. sheshe2 Apr 2014 #92

I "should know better with 141 K to stay out the gutter! Cha Apr 2014 #94

JHC, Alerted on for calling Scalia an "asshole".. I woulda thought it was self-evident.. Cha Apr 2014 #83

Cha, I can not imagine ANYONE who had read pangaia Apr 2014 #88

And, the subject was Scalia, was it not? Cha Apr 2014 #89

I knew not. pangaia Apr 2014 #96

I thought it was pretty funny pintobean Apr 2014 #97

It is funny.. I'm glad there were 5 thinking jurors, though.. whew! again, thank you Cha Apr 2014 #98

Wow. There sure are some on DU with itchy alert fingers. nt SunSeeker Apr 2014 #90

No doubt! I've been on more than a few juries that corroborates Cha Apr 2014 #100

Tell me about it.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #103

That man needs to go! sheshe2 Apr 2014 #7

So... 99Forever Apr 2014 #8

Maybe because our Democratically appointed and controlled Justice Department onenote Apr 2014 #10

What will Senators Warren and Sanders say about Scalia's intentions? DhhD Apr 2014 #48

Since Scalia is likely taking bribes fasttense Apr 2014 #64

Perhaps a progressive populist revolution is needed, WHEN CRABS ROAR Apr 2014 #99

what about our people Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #12

This is a Supreme Court Judge calling for traitorous and treasonable acts. 99Forever Apr 2014 #14

I dont like this judge Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #16

Who you like or not is irrelevant. 99Forever Apr 2014 #43

See post #20 onenote Apr 2014 #54

Should Thomas Jefferson have been "locked up in a VERY deep, dark hole"? NYC Liberal Apr 2014 #82

For someone who clearly doesn't understand the legal concepts onenote Apr 2014 #20

It's even more fundamental than that Boreal Apr 2014 #71

Occupy did not "take control" of government property. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #26

they occupied with the intent to disrupt Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #31

The Occupy movement was protesting the banks, not so much the government. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #35

bundy was not part of the discussion Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #36

Nobody has the right to intimidate law enforcement with guns and then call it peaceful assembly. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #37

why are you bringing a bundy up this is not a thread Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #39

Because you brought up Occupy. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #63

us citizens have a history Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #65

Is this speech or peaceful assembly? Iterate Apr 2014 #38

it was an obvious photo op Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #40

I saw no damage at Zucotti Park 2pooped2pop Apr 2014 #42

Their intent was not to protest outside their tent, but on the streets, in front of the banks. DhhD Apr 2014 #49

Sedition: "Conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state." rhett o rick Apr 2014 #62

Under US law it doesn't matter what it might do. The question is whether it it does so. onenote Apr 2014 #69

Kick 99Forever Apr 2014 #9

Scalia is nothing but a glorified partisan hack! He revels in the fact that the normal rules Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #11

Scalia used to keep his crazy on a much tighter leash. DirkGently Apr 2014 #13

When people get old... Helen Borg Apr 2014 #22

He's really let it hang out now. DirkGently Apr 2014 #24

Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author Niceguy1 Apr 2014 #17

Just the usual crybaby right winger routine... clg311 Apr 2014 #18

Guess some laws (wink wink vaffanculo) you don't need to follow. Octafish Apr 2014 #19

This mean drunk thinks Helen Borg Apr 2014 #21

Well he probably is safe from impeachment as long as Republicans hold the House Samantha Apr 2014 #28

In a general sense defacto7 Apr 2014 #29

Next he will be wearing a winter ermine collar with a reversible brown one, with a sewn in label DhhD Apr 2014 #50

I would call sedition a high crime or misdemeanor. eom MohRokTah Apr 2014 #23

But this isn't sedition any more than my calling for revolution while protesting the Vietnam War onenote Apr 2014 #25

As hard as it is to take, defacto7 Apr 2014 #30

WHEN is enough enough??? KauaiK Apr 2014 #27

It seems to me defacto7 Apr 2014 #32

That is one man who I absolutely intend to piss on his grave. Moostache Apr 2014 #33

Scalia's partisanship goes way back. He doesn't even try to hide it. mississippi62 Apr 2014 #34

Somehow I don't think a revolt would work out the way Fat Tony thinks it would Exposethefrauds Apr 2014 #41

Scalia's Salary malletgirl02 Apr 2014 #44

And now too, he should stay off interstate highways paid for by federal tax revenue. DhhD Apr 2014 #52

That's my thought - doesn't he (and his rich buddies) need us to pay our taxes? erronis Apr 2014 #60

Instigator, inciting violence sorefeet Apr 2014 #45

�but if it reaches a certain point, perhaps you should revolt.� seveneyes Apr 2014 #47

There is none so blind.. 99Forever Apr 2014 #51

It may be your definition of sedition, but it isn't the definition that the courts have applied onenote Apr 2014 #55

Perhaps I missed the quote that is attributed to sedition? seveneyes Apr 2014 #58

This message was self-deleted by its author 99Forever Apr 2014 #85

What you're missing onenote Apr 2014 #56

This man is an embarrassment... deathrind Apr 2014 #53

Opus Dei Catholic fascist Scalia needs to be ex-communicated... radhika Apr 2014 #57

Scalia is a disgrace for SCOTUS. He is not the only saidsimplesimon Apr 2014 #61

Can we start impeachment proceedings now? nt silvershadow Apr 2014 #66

They can be started as soon as the House agrees to start them. So don't hold your breath. onenote Apr 2014 #70

K&R DeSwiss Apr 2014 #67

Fine, Tony! Can we stop paying your salary? muntrv Apr 2014 #68

It just shows how corrupt this government has become in 34 years since Reagan . geretogo Apr 2014 #72

With instant news and so many other inventions it's probably just more noticeable nolabels Apr 2014 #75

Exactly . Fox News is the Trojan hoarse entering homes and altering peoples perception of geretogo Apr 2014 #77

Actually according to our nation's founding fathers- CFLDem Apr 2014 #73

Ater I read that I feel we are coming close to the words in the last three sentences . I guess it geretogo Apr 2014 #78

He's a scumbag, but not a total idiot Reter Apr 2014 #74

I concur in part with Justice Scalia, but he won't like why Jack Rabbit Apr 2014 #76

High taxes are relative . In the Nordic countries taxes are high but most goes back to the people geretogo Apr 2014 #79

2016:Primary for your choice of POTUS, but at the polls elect a Dem,any Dem. If you don't understand Hekate Apr 2014 #80

If revolt is justified by high taxes, what should we do about stolen elections? n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #86

^^^THIS^^^ Hekate Apr 2014 #95

Impeach him BlueJac Apr 2014 #87

Domestic terrorist. SunSeeker Apr 2014 #91

In other words, just another Tuesday in Scaliaville. blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #93

get out the vote Miigwech Apr 2014 #101

I think he would have had to be more specific than that for it to be called sedition. totodeinhere Apr 2014 #102

I don't like Scalia betterdemsonly Apr 2014 #104

Not surprised he is a devotee of Ayn Rand. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2014 #105

Commits Sedition? No, not really OutNow Apr 2014 #106