Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

liberalhistorian

(20,905 posts)
82. Well, yes, indeed,
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 01:41 PM
Apr 2014

That is the true mystery. Then again, I've met some really self-hating, misogynistic women in my lifetime, so maybe it's not entirely a mystery.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A rose by any other name dipsydoodle Apr 2014 #1
and sexual assault is fairly close linguistically to sexy assault Supersedeas Apr 2014 #7
Language matters. MineralMan Apr 2014 #2
he forced her to have sex. that, we see a lot. no. he raped her. i agree mineral. nt seabeyond Apr 2014 #4
That and sex with intoxicated women. MineralMan Apr 2014 #5
God, I remember the wheedling, whining, and pressuring. wryter2000 Apr 2014 #9
Yes. Giving in in the face of pressure is something MineralMan Apr 2014 #16
That long-ago girlfriend . . . Brigid Apr 2014 #20
Well, she was pretty awesome on her own. MineralMan Apr 2014 #46
this is the kind of thing that mopinko Apr 2014 #25
You're a great example of how it can go right erronis Apr 2014 #35
Love this: CrispyQ Apr 2014 #11
And Yes! is lots more fun, too. MineralMan Apr 2014 #17
+1000 heaven05 Apr 2014 #21
Then you have radio shock jocks like Tom Leykis who advocate getting women drunk R B Garr Apr 2014 #55
Guys like that are assholes, plain and simple. MineralMan Apr 2014 #62
Leykis is a pig who hates women, liberalhistorian Apr 2014 #69
The mystery is chervilant Apr 2014 #71
Well, yes, indeed, liberalhistorian Apr 2014 #82
This. nt redqueen Apr 2014 #83
so many men, continuously talk so ugly about women, too often. what would happen in mens world seabeyond Apr 2014 #78
If the word doesn't exist, then there is no such thing (semantic sarcasm) Tansy_Gold Apr 2014 #43
bad enough, guilty enough, to kick off campus, yet not use criminal system and send to jail. seabeyond Apr 2014 #3
Sadly... Even when found "responsible" only 10-25% get kicked off campus... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #6
He should edit what he said. CrispyQ Apr 2014 #12
And by not kicking them out of school and ... aggiesal Apr 2014 #14
It took 25 women showing up in the dean of students' office to get one off our campus. Gormy Cuss Apr 2014 #15
If a football player is found guilty lark Apr 2014 #30
I'm not sure how one relates to the other Sgent Apr 2014 #60
Wow CFLDem Apr 2014 #8
Is one of the take-aways of this: Victims should pursue civil and criminal charges with law KurtNYC Apr 2014 #10
I would think yes... But I'm not certain it is so simple Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #13
They must, yes. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #19
Unfortunately it's somewhat more complicated than that: LeftyMom Apr 2014 #22
It IS a consent issue. AtheistCrusader Apr 2014 #18
Thanks for posting this despite some DUers expressing their "exasperation at posts discussing rape." redqueen Apr 2014 #23
I remember marions ghost Apr 2014 #24
I am an old woman (52) etherealtruth Apr 2014 #27
That's horrific, but not sadly, not so surprising YoungDemCA Apr 2014 #61
Right marions ghost Apr 2014 #66
I thought this happened because rape often has a narrow legal definition aikoaiko Apr 2014 #26
Good term. Non-consensual sex is broader encompassing more crimes than classic "rape". Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #28
Is it also 'good' that they are doing it to cover up rapes? Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #32
That's opinion. I'm not sure it would be supported by careful studies. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #34
Since schools are working to hide the numbers, the number of rapes is not known... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #39
Disagree lark Apr 2014 #33
You miss the boat. Non consensual sex is much more than vaginal or anal penetration. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #38
Again disagree lark Apr 2014 #41
A lot of times the law doesn't call it "rape" either davidn3600 Apr 2014 #44
We are talking about changing the name to cover up rape... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #49
Educated people (LE included) understand more than just four letter words. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #45
Are you being deliberately obtuse? chervilant Apr 2014 #52
Obtuse? Surely you realize assault is non-consensual & rape does involve sex or attempted sex. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #57
You seem woefully misinformed about rape, chervilant Apr 2014 #58
Be smart & explain yourself. If it doesn't involve a sexual aspect, then it's battery, not rape. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #59
'We,' Bernie? chervilant Apr 2014 #67
Rape is sexual assault (battery, actually) & it's primarily a power/violence thing. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #68
Pedantic repetition does not make you right. chervilant Apr 2014 #70
I asked for help but you won't address the points or answer the questions asked of you. So be it. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #72
Making justifications for schools covering up for rapists is not asking for help Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #73
Nothing I wrote was a justification for covering up rapists. NOTHING. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #74
Yes... All of it is Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #75
NOTHING. Covering up rape is not justified. You are confusing me with other posters. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #76
No... No confusion... You said it was 'good' that they change the terms... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #77
The language is good. The coverup is bad, wrong, evil, and is independent of language. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #79
No... You continue to ignore that the change is exactly to cover up rapes... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #80
I DO NOT JUSTIFY NOT CALLING RAPE A RAPE. That is the administration's fault, not the language. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #81
Non-sense. You are defending the change when you know why it is being changed... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #84
You don't want enlighten or educate (as asked for). You just want to argue Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #86
The article is clear and I am as well... That you ignore it, is your choice... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #88
I don't defend schools protecting rapists. I've said it before.You can make up stuff all you want.nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #89
Ask yourself two questions... Ohio Joe Apr 2014 #90
The first question is way too simplistic. It easier for you to attack if it is simplistic. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #91
Not if I'm the one being raped or someone attempts to rape me ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #85
Exactly. It is primarily violence, but there is a sexual aspect even if it is not sexy. Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #87
"rape" is in scare quotes? YoungDemCA Apr 2014 #64
It is quoted because we are discussing definitions and terminology. Only you are scared. nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #65
Perhaps murder is "nonconsensual third party suicide"? nt Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2014 #29
haha was gonna say the same thing! bettydavis Apr 2014 #36
+1,000,000 lark Apr 2014 #42
I was listening to the lawyer of tje Heisman trophy talking about false accusations, Thinkingabout Apr 2014 #31
but. . there is NO war on women. niyad Apr 2014 #37
Maybe some of these enabling universities need a BIG class action lawsuit. hlthe2b Apr 2014 #40
Part of it is Clery Act fallout. Xithras Apr 2014 #47
Denial is a terrible thing, no matter if it's well intentioned or not. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #48
Prosecution needs to be taken completely out of the hands of colleges LadyHawkAZ Apr 2014 #50
And, chervilant Apr 2014 #51
Should, yes LadyHawkAZ Apr 2014 #53
Excellent point. chervilant Apr 2014 #54
K&R ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #56
Anyone responsible for sexual assault should be in jail. nt rrneck Apr 2014 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nonconsensual sex: How co...»Reply #82