Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
35. funny story about that
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 03:16 PM
Mar 2012

when I was uninsured, I walked into an ER and received fairly expensive care, for which I was billed $800, including some $500 for X-rays that I really did not need at all. I paid that all, $50 a month, except for the last $200 or so. For some strange reason when I owed about $200, they said I could pay off the whole thing if I just paid $100 now. I found that to be odd.

I also found it odd that they let me pay the $50 a month using my credit card. Why not insist that I pay the whole thing with my credit card and then make minimum payments to the credit card?

Then later I had insurance and I noticed something strange. For example, I had a hospital stay for which I was billed $13,900. I remember that amount because the hospital sent me that bill and for a while I thought maybe that was the remaining amount that I owed and that I was doomed forever to a life of severe poverty. Later it turned out that my insurance company had paid $12,400 and that I only owed $400.

Yet, because I had insurance I ended up paying $1,100 LESS than what I was billed. If I had been uninsured, I would have been on the hook for the whole $13,900.

Later I had arthroscopic knee surgery and I was billed $4,000 or so. Of which the insurance company paid about $1200 and I paid nothing.

My insurance company also regularly bills my dentist less than he bills me. Back when I had no dental insurance, I paid the full amount.

So tell me again how the uninsured are being subsidized by the insured, because it looks to me like the insured are getting the discounts.

I also know a guy with no dental insurance who has been in pain for months because of his teeth, some of which he tried to pull on his own. He has not worked since mid December, as far as I know, so he cannot afford food and rent, much less health insurance, which may or may not even include dental.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I guess to some Politicalboi Mar 2012 #1
I know the costs are different but the concept is the same Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #2
If the health insurance industry takes over the supermarket chains we're really fucked! Better Believe It Mar 2012 #3
Holler at me when we are paying taxes for our healthcare TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #4
We already were before the ACA jeff47 Mar 2012 #8
Someone really smart once said zipplewrath Mar 2012 #5
I know that someone on DU said that Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #6
Everyone DOESN'T pay taxes zipplewrath Mar 2012 #7
The penalty to not get insurance is limited to 2.5% of one's income and there are subsidies for Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #11
It is "unprecidented" zipplewrath Mar 2012 #15
How about we cut out that for-profit middleman? enlightenment Mar 2012 #9
That's a separate issue. I support single payer health care at the state level Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #12
Uh, no it is not separate. Other countries use a mandate, not one of them allows profit Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #21
The subject of my post is the govenment compelling people to buy a good or service they might not Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #22
Because the Congress needs bribe/lobby money and they're not near as likely to get so much if Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #32
Just so people get it.... Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #13
Unfortunately that guy is long gone from the political scene... n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2012 #14
I miss that guy zipplewrath Mar 2012 #16
You never know who'll show up during an election campaign. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2012 #17
Reunion concert zipplewrath Mar 2012 #19
If you don't have the money for the house, the government gives it to you treestar Mar 2012 #34
Would you support mandated food insurance instead of food stamps? girl gone mad Mar 2012 #10
food stamps are a form of mandated food insurance. People pay for them with their tax dollars Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #18
One is a contract with the government and one is with a private, extremely rich, corporation joeglow3 Mar 2012 #26
You can walk into an er, receive care (very expensive care), and then not pay for it Native Mar 2012 #20
funny story about that hfojvt Mar 2012 #35
You're talking about a different situation. Native Mar 2012 #37
Also too, if you don't buy food for your kids you get your kids taken away from you. applegrove Mar 2012 #23
Not true SATIRical Mar 2012 #24
Bad analogy SATIRical Mar 2012 #25
Some don't pay income tax but they pay other taxes Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #31
But some people do know people who own a cow SATIRical Mar 2012 #36
Taxes aren't the same thing as forced private purchases. Romulox Mar 2012 #27
The only difference is that the money goes directly to the insurance companies Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #28
There isn't as much difference as you might think Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #29
How does this intersect with the Third Amendment analysis? AngryAmish Mar 2012 #30
I'm sorry. I'm not a legal expert. Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #33
Regarding the analogy that buying something from a private company hughee99 Mar 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regarding the analogy tha...»Reply #35