Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)NBC analyzing poor David Gregory to see what makes his show so bad [View all]
The "Meet the Press" anchor's public humiliations continueALEX PAREENE
If its Monday, its NBC embarrassing itself in front of everyone. Today, the Washington Posts Paul Farhi brings us the story of a network that cant figure out why Meet the Press isnt the runaway ratings smash it used to be. (This is not the first piece of this year exploring that subject.) Is the problem host David Gregory? They sent in experts to figure it out:
Last year, the network undertook an unusual assessment of the 43-year-old journalist, commissioning a psychological consultant to interview his friends and even his wife. The idea, according to a network spokeswoman, Meghan Pianta, was to get perspective and insight from people who know him best. But the research project struck some at NBC as odd, given that Gregory has been employed there for nearly 20 years.
Well, how absolutely humiliating, to have this reported in the Washington Post. (NBC disputes the use of the word psychological, claiming they brought in a brand consultant.)
Is there something psychologically wrong with David Gregory? No, besides the usual superhuman vanity of a television professional. He is just not a great host of a news talk show! He is incurious. He asks predictable questions and is not informed enough to ask follow-ups that go beyond the scope of his briefing materials.
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/04/21/nbc_analyzing_poor_david_gregory_to_see_what_makes_his_show_so_bad/
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Also, Gregory is a lot less clever about hiding his rw bias than was Russert the Elder.
merrily
Apr 2014
#3
Exactly right. I don't know what all the fawning about Tim Russert was all about. He was a W hack
BlueStreak
Apr 2014
#8
R or D? It barely mattters inside the Beltway. The beltway media all work for the same people.
BlueStreak
Apr 2014
#15
Bet they'll conclude that he should be replace with a thinly-disguised spokesmodel,
winter is coming
Apr 2014
#5
In a nutshell: "He is incurious. He asks predictable questions and is not informed enough..."
Hekate
Apr 2014
#9
Allowing Wingers to claim the Earth is flat and ask questions as if the position is viable is what
uponit7771
Apr 2014
#10
I don't know enough about David Gregory to have anything against him.
Shoulders of Giants
Apr 2014
#16
Corporate mangement is famous for making decisions and then fixing the facts around them
KurtNYC
Apr 2014
#17
They don't sound to bright at nbc.. Wondering why MTP isn't a success like it use to be?..
Cha
Apr 2014
#26
And conservatives have the audacity to claim this shill has a liberal bias!
tarheelsunc
Apr 2014
#27
So backward looking....only forward my friend, like a workhorse with blinders
Jesus Malverde
Apr 2014
#34