General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NBC analyzing poor David Gregory to see what makes his show so bad [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)I think that led many on both the right and the left to assume that Russert was a Democrat as well. I've seen both sides react to Russert accordingly.
I don't know what Russert was when a kid working for a Democratic politician, but I knew what he was when I watched him on Meet the Press.
Russert liked to say that he asked the tough questions of everyone. What he really did was ask tough questions of Democrats, not infrequently hammering at them again and again and again. Sometimes, his questions were ludicrous, as when he spent a lot of his interview time with then Presidential hopeful Obama, trying to hold Obama to account for something Harry Belafonte had said the day before or something. (Was that the most interesting thing to ask Senator Obama? And why is Obama supposed to be accountable for what Harry Belafonte says anyway?)
Of Republicans, he asked the tough questions that allowed them to give their answer to negative things that were being said about them or their policies, gave them lots of opportunity to respond as they wished, then he asked either no follow ups or lobbed his Republican subject a meatball.
I am very, very sorry for his untimely death. Among many other more important things, like the loss to his loved ones, I (too) would rather still be watching a show hosted by Russert than one hosted by Gregory. But, I have described Russert's mo accurately. Moreover, he was more than smart enough to know exactly what he was doing, so when he preened about his even handed objectivity, he also knew that was lying through his teeth.
I remember one of the first times I saw Luke as a "youth correspondent." It was during the 2008 primary or election season. Luke was gushing over how much college kids loved McCain because McCain is "just so authentic."
Did Luke, too, know he was lying? I don't know, but the college vote sure wasn't going McCain's way that year.