Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 15 Years After Columbine, How "Never Again" Became "Oh Well" [View all]CTyankee
(67,931 posts)44. Your insight on generational change being the answer is, I believe, correct.
Demographics is working relentlessly. We are less white, less rural, more culturally diverse and getting more so every day. Every year it gets worse from the other side on this debate. It is only a matter of time, unless gun enthusiasts can persuade all of that changing demographic that their side is correct. But my bet is on the relentless demographic change in this country.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But I'm sure the fact we're unable to pass even moderate gun control in this country, doesn't help.
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#3
Universial background checks would not stop mass shootings. Look at the last few......
Logical
Apr 2014
#8
"Criminals have no trouble getting guns." Therefore no gun control whatsoever?
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#13
Let me know what you propose. Most here post irrational crap that will stop nothing. nt
Logical
Apr 2014
#14
Much like this entire thread is a pathetic attempt for more gun control n/t
Lurks Often
Apr 2014
#65
I thought cutting down on the thousands of homicides a year would be good enough.
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#16
I don't accept that thousands of homicides would be prevented with "relatively mild" measures
badtoworse
Apr 2014
#34
Yes, the murder rate is substantially lower than 20 years. But it's still the highest in the
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#15
you're accusing the families of the victims of using Newtown as a "PR gimmick"?
CreekDog
Apr 2014
#48
Ah, you made some people laugh at the girl's death? Good job, then, CreekDog!
Skip Intro
Apr 2014
#54
Not knowledgeable about guns or the proper terminology for the various types and styles of...
3catwoman3
Apr 2014
#140
You're referring to biometric or RFID systems that lock out unauthorized users.
Bazinga
Apr 2014
#149
and shortly before or that a lunatic opened up on firefighters in a suburb on my city with an AR
dionysus
Apr 2014
#108
As much as this place sucks now, I still don't think I've seen anything as disgusting as your post
Number23
Apr 2014
#148
I'm all for UBCs, though not necessarily how they were proposed after Sandy Hook.
Bazinga
Apr 2014
#114
Fair enough. But I'm open to anything that might reduce our thousands of gun homicides a year
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#118
I agree the focus on semi-auto rifles is excessive, when handguns are responsible for most of the
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#132
Hopefully, preventing the worst of the crazies from having guns, or at least from obtaining more.
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#162
If they have a criminal (certainly felony) record since obtaining the gun, then yes, it should be
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#165
So what do we do about the admittedly fairly small minority of gun owners who are a potential
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#168
I don't consider gun owners in general my opponents. Only those opposed to any gun control at all
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#170
It's rare in most civilized countries that have strong gun laws. It's not rare here.
Arugula Latte
Apr 2014
#76
And people like you are as bad as the "everyone should be armed" group. No logic needed. nt
Logical
Apr 2014
#7
Typically it is anyone who believes in the freedom of civilians/poor to own a gun
The Straight Story
Apr 2014
#43
You need a license and registration papers to drive a car, why not to own a gun?
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#92
we sure like to wallow--our only actions are blundering vengeance against brown people (Afghanistan,
MisterP
Apr 2014
#29
And to think, I was blaming the murder of children on the murderers themselves...
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#40
Since you have knowledge of someone aiding and abetting in the murder of children who has not been
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#47
We can't do anything about guns because there are other things which claim more lives
Major Nikon
Apr 2014
#70
That's the problem, you want to do "ANYTHING!" You don't even know what it is you want to do or why.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#71
You stated yourself that the inner cities had a higher murder rate than rural communities.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#77
Ah yes, a clever repackaging of the tired old "guns don't kill people" meme
Major Nikon
Apr 2014
#82
I am talking about the List of countries by firearm-related death rate which he posted.
CTyankee
Apr 2014
#112
Ah, revelation! Thank you. It explains everything...of course...how could those countries
CTyankee
Apr 2014
#126
Well, it can't be guns because as US laws become more lax the homicide rate is dropping.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#133
and how well we are doing up against all these other countries...isn't it marvelous?
CTyankee
Apr 2014
#136
"You want to eliminate the guns but are content in leaving the intent to commit murder"
Major Nikon
Apr 2014
#91
Really? Then how do you explain places where gun ownership is high but murder rates are low?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#95
the man who killed my niece was not a career criminal. He was law abiding until he wasn't.
CTyankee
Apr 2014
#127
An anecdote is not the basis for law and I think your retelling of events is suspect.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#137
No you're not. You've been rebutted repeatedly you just ignore the facts.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#134
Universal background checks, and some form of registration - probably at the state, not federal
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#94
The deaths, the injuries, the violence, and the accidents are simply part and parcel of the price we
LanternWaste
Apr 2014
#84
I have no problem with gun ownership in itself. It's the elevation of the firearm to a kind of holy
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#97
Not here, maybe. But that mentality does exist in the wider society - just look at the people who
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#119
I mean how some people always, no matter what, take the side of the shooter.
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#122
The holy relic part isn't guns, it's freedoms. From abortion to speech to guns
The Straight Story
Apr 2014
#115
I'm not opposed to gun ownership. All I want are background checks, some form of registration
nomorenomore08
Apr 2014
#120
Makes sense. Good to have an intelligent discussion with someone on it :)
The Straight Story
Apr 2014
#138
