Got back from Boston about an hour ago.

[msanthrope]

33. No, actually I found Mr. Pitt's apology to be factually deficient, and I don't accept it, as I told

him:

You never had an ACA problem. You had a formulary problem. Under the ACA, however, you have new rights to appeal the formulary decision, and you *may* have rights to a temporary 30-day supply. My suggestion is that you seek legal advice--and not rely on your idiot of a friend who told you this amazingly incorrect information (which I note that you STILL haven't corrected, or apologized for):

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4686037

An ENTIRE thread was devoted to correcting this piece of incorrect information.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4687956

Note--you did not bother to participate in that thread, or otherwise admit that you were wrong.

As the mother of a disabled child who is currently taking two non-formulary medications, and having gone through the "appeal process" more than once, I found your anger to be completely misplaced. I also found the repeated threads, each upping the ante, to be divisive and unseemly. They made DU suck.

Will you admit you were simply wrong?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4768529

I think Will should admit that he had a formulary problem, and not an ACA one. And I think a proper apology would acknowledge pnwmom's excellent thread.