Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
26. If all bad science was woo...
Tue Apr 22, 2014, 02:06 PM
Apr 2014

The explosion of the space shuttle Challenger was (to cite an example) not due to pseudo-science. It was due to poor engineering.

If someone had proposed a theory that rubber becomes fire-proof when fashioned into a circle because the circle is a perfect form that would be woo.

But the miscalculation of how easily the rubber O-rings could be burned through was just an engineering error. It wasn't based on any exotic theory. It was not set up as scientifically untestable.

It was just an error in a system of execution within science.

And since protocols that block all potentially dangerous prescription meds would be blocking too many worthwhile medicines we are talking about setting a level of acceptable risk.

One can argue that the accepted level of risk is too high, but an accepted risk level too high in drug approval protocols is hardly pseudo-science.

It is policy, which exists to be continually examined in light of evidence.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A drug being dangerous doesn't make it "woo" cthulu2016 Apr 2014 #1
It sure as heck wasn't "good science", yet it was approved for use. nt Electric Monk Apr 2014 #2
Clinical efficacy and safety trials not infrequently fail to detect the extent of adverse effects. hlthe2b Apr 2014 #4
Woo "attempts to place itself as scientifically, or at least reasonably, supported." Electric Monk Apr 2014 #6
Not a single person on this thread supports your broad brush use of that term. Time to rethink... hlthe2b Apr 2014 #10
The OP was an open question, for discussion, not an absolute conclusion. nt Electric Monk Apr 2014 #11
You are using a term that does not fit nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #19
Wrong. n/t pnwmom Apr 2014 #29
LOLOL hlthe2b Apr 2014 #31
They've released a drug whose effects cannot be measured pnwmom Apr 2014 #32
Honestly, pnwmom hlthe2b Apr 2014 #33
I used to work with investigators who were carrying out clinical trials, pnwmom Apr 2014 #34
I agree with you with respect to acupuncture, which has been shown to induce release of endorphins. hlthe2b Apr 2014 #36
I don't think the OP was saying that the conduct of clinical trials is woo. pnwmom Apr 2014 #37
What you will likewise find is a dearth of research on alternatives to many orthopedic surgeries.. hlthe2b Apr 2014 #38
To clarify, woo isn't the procedure or item itself NuclearDem Apr 2014 #41
This is another attempt to have members of DU accept Woo as science.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #9
+100 Vashta Nerada Apr 2014 #17
And sometimes the drug companies suppress the reports of the adverse affects. SheilaT Apr 2014 #28
Yet another issue, but not reflective of clinical trials failing to detect adverse effects = "woo" hlthe2b Apr 2014 #30
There is a diabetes med nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #8
Nadine... Even the best of scientific method (clinical trials) can fail to detect serious adverse hlthe2b Apr 2014 #12
In that case there was clear fraud nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #18
It may well have been. I'm sorry you experienced that. hlthe2b Apr 2014 #20
Look up Avandia nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #21
Indeed. You are correct with respect to Avandia. hlthe2b Apr 2014 #24
If all bad science was woo... cthulu2016 Apr 2014 #26
The word 'woo' is seriously overused on this website. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #3
and no it doesn't VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #7
That's because it is jargon, slang made up by a specific community Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #23
That imprecision is a deliberate attempt to discredit the word mathematic Apr 2014 #27
Still not woo.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #5
This is Woo TlalocW Apr 2014 #13
I have actually seen THAT Woo at a 7-11 paying for gas once! VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #14
No, pharmaceuticals aren't pseudoscience. NuclearDem Apr 2014 #15
Chiropracty gets dismissed as woo here, and I don't claim it works by magic. nt Electric Monk Apr 2014 #16
Because of vertebral sublaxation and whether it actually exists or not. NuclearDem Apr 2014 #22
Is there some particular reason you seem eager to broaden... Silent3 Apr 2014 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author riverwalker Apr 2014 #35
I get what you are trying to say. laundry_queen Apr 2014 #39
Not woo. The clinical trials were done as required and it is effective in preventing stroke. Avalux Apr 2014 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»re: What is or isn't &quo...»Reply #26