Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OMG Elizabeth Warren went there! Finally someone calls Hillary Clinton what she is [View all]Beacool
(30,514 posts)99. Did I say anyone had to care???
Thought not..........
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OMG Elizabeth Warren went there! Finally someone calls Hillary Clinton what she is [View all]
Otelo
Apr 2014
OP
And if Hillary picked her as VP and it is accepted... heads at DU would simultaneously explode!
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#6
Going from Senate to the White House has even LESS of a track record and LESS
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#34
Let me say this: But Elizabeth Warren strikes me as a truly different person. And we do
Cal33
Apr 2014
#147
I agree. She'd be wasted as a VP. She is 64 now. By 2020 or 2024 she'd be 70 or 74 -- too
Cal33
Apr 2014
#148
Why would they explode? You're assuming that DUers are a bunch of lock step robots??
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#32
I guess it's kind of like overlooking the fact that many of the people who ran the West German gover
Victor_c3
Apr 2014
#71
Human life and dignity, war crimes against innocent people, torture, hundreds of thousands
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#75
No intended insults, but let me spell it out: Slim pickens =possible candidates who voted
maddiemom
Apr 2014
#142
Okay, that is certainly a good point. Sorry if I misunderstood your point ...
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#143
I and millions of others supported OBama OVER Hillary because of her support for Bush's illegal
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#72
It didn't turn out very well which is all the more reason to be DOUBLY careful this time.
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#92
Not only did she vote for the war, she boldly stated that she wasn't at all sorry for her part
Victor_c3
Apr 2014
#65
I remember that. That finished me with her. At least some of the others apologized
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#77
They tried to smear people like MM and were worse than the far right when it came to actual
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#111
It would be an absolute waste, better she stay in the Senate, head Treasury, or go to the FED
TheKentuckian
Apr 2014
#104
A populist leaning liberal? Who is more liberal than the current President...AND a Democrat
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#12
It's someone who covers for the pillaging of the nation by corporate interests.
Orsino
Apr 2014
#150
She's a Third Way advocate. We've seen the results of that over the past dozen years or so.
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#35
The people of this nation HAVE heard it.....the problem that you always forget is...
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#136
Oh yeah....and just hearing it from a "Socialist" is going to change all their minds....
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#155
I'll ask again: To what question was that the response? Here, I'll help you out...
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#13
You will not find a single post where I am "trashing Hillary". If I'm trashing Hillary, then
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#113
Well she is terrific for a centrist pro wall street politician. I got nothing against Hillary
el_bryanto
Apr 2014
#15
Does that mean that Warren thinks Hillary's support of Bush's wars was "terrific"?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2014
#20
It means Warren does not think the Iraq War vote is not the only issue in the world
Otelo
Apr 2014
#26
If that is Warren's position I have zero problem saying goodbye to her also. Politics is about
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#42
If one says FDR was terrific, does that mean they support mass imprisonment of Japanese-Americans?
NYC Liberal
Apr 2014
#29
Maybe it's because I've seen more posts on how Warren is not running for prez than any other.
Dawgs
Apr 2014
#28
As someone who would be pleased as punch with Hillary or Warren (I'm still learning about Warren
Number23
Apr 2014
#108
We should be afraid, we are into a new gilded age, we are behind the 8 ball on the environment,
TheKentuckian
Apr 2014
#115
Well they should too. Given todays political climte a Warren candidacy could
NorthCarolina
Apr 2014
#49
She forgot to finish the quote: "I think Hillary Clinton is terrific for the 1%".
Vashta Nerada
Apr 2014
#52
I really hope that there will be a primary and that Hilary won't be "anointed".
GoneOffShore
Apr 2014
#73
If Texas will vote Hillary in, with its size, the psychopathic GOP will be dead and buried... n/t
freshwest
Apr 2014
#120
I find amusing the people having a sad because Warren won't hate on Clinton. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2014
#158