Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I-Team: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny (It seems that his claims are all lies) [View all]Elmergantry
(884 posts)64. Yes I agree but
I think its pretty well known he was wanting to graze on Federal Land.
I was under the impression this article would prove that his familiy never grazed on federal land back in 1870's, thus exposing the "lie".
Doesnt appear to do that at all.
Been having arguments with Nutters... would be an awesome point to show proof his family never grazed back then..
Ah well...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I-Team: Bundy's 'ancestral rights' come under scrutiny (It seems that his claims are all lies) [View all]
kpete
Apr 2014
OP
These right wing bastards never cease to amaze me with how corrupt they are...
Theyletmeeatcake2
Apr 2014
#18
waitaminute, he wants collective family usufruct of a commons AND private, personal property?
MisterP
Apr 2014
#33
Here's a solution: He grazes his beef on our land and then sells his product at a deep discount...
DesertDiamond
Apr 2014
#40