Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Ahh, Memory Lane..."Obama's Bad Pick: A Former [Cable Industry] Lobbyist at the FCC" [View all]
From the New Yorker:
Memo to a President who said, in November, 2007, I am in this race to tell the corporate lobbyists in Washington that their days of setting the agenda are over: If you are going to name a former lobbyist for big cable and wireless companies as head of the federal agency that regulates the cable and wireless industries, you had better find a public-interest-group advocate to say something positive about him (or her) before you make the announcement.
Job done.
By Wednesday, when the White House confirmed that it was nominating Tom Wheeler, a veteran Washington insider who has headed not one powerful industry association but two, as the next chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, the nomination had already secured the support of Public Knowledge, an advocacy group that promotes open and unlimited access to the Internet. Certainly we will have disagreements with the new Chairman (assuming Wheeler is confirmed), but we expect that Wheeler will actively work to promote competition and protect consumers, Harold Feld, a senior vice-president at Public Knowledge, wrote in a blog post.
Job done.
By Wednesday, when the White House confirmed that it was nominating Tom Wheeler, a veteran Washington insider who has headed not one powerful industry association but two, as the next chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, the nomination had already secured the support of Public Knowledge, an advocacy group that promotes open and unlimited access to the Internet. Certainly we will have disagreements with the new Chairman (assuming Wheeler is confirmed), but we expect that Wheeler will actively work to promote competition and protect consumers, Harold Feld, a senior vice-president at Public Knowledge, wrote in a blog post.
Well, I guess we know how that turned out. Welcome to the new corporately controlled internet.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ahh, Memory Lane..."Obama's Bad Pick: A Former [Cable Industry] Lobbyist at the FCC" [View all]
Maven
Apr 2014
OP
So bad that Warren, Sanders, and Franken voted for him, unreservedly? Your OP is facile, because
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#1
Apparently, Sanders kept an open mind, kept his promise, and met with Wheeler and voted for him....
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#3
"Senators Urge FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to ‘Move Quickly’ to Preserve ‘Open Internet'"
Maven
Apr 2014
#6
I asked on another thread just how the reclassification was going to survive the same court...since
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#7
Yes--they did...10 years ago. In the 2002 case. So now, kindly explain to me how the FCC, as
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#12
Correct, the FCC classified ISPs as an "information service", not a telecom...EXACTLY as I said
Maven
Apr 2014
#13
Yes--it actually does need a legal reason to change its own rules. That's how a democracy works.
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#14
I understand you backing down. But I really would like for you to tell us all exactly the legal
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#17
I'm not backing down at all. You're simply wrong, you don't understand how to read the decision
Maven
Apr 2014
#18
Again...tell me the legal justification for the rule change. It's a pretty simple question, and you
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#20
see e.g. NATIONAL CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION ET AL v. BRAND X INTERNET SERVICES ET AL
Maven
Apr 2014
#22
What? You've cited an opinion where SCOTUS agrees that the classification of "information services"
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#23
Um, no. Your problem is that you still haven't provided a legal basis for changing the
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#25
If there are plenty of legal arguments, then would you please LIST THEM?????
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#28
I'll jump in here: the FCC does not have "complete discretion" to change a previous position
onenote
Apr 2014
#32
LOL. It's so refreshing to read the words of people like Sanders and Warren
Cali_Democrat
Apr 2014
#8
Nice article where the Republicans express their dislike of Wheeler for proposing more regulations..
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#15
Indeed--and Wheeler proposed regulations against AT&T when they tried to merge. The fact
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#21
And once again The Group sides with Corp-America. The FCC just another tool for Corp-America.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#29
The problem is, Josh, andyou have captured it, is that there's the 2002 directive. Plus the
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#35
Obama? Favoring corporate interests over those of his electorate, in one of his picks!?
villager
Apr 2014
#26