Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ahh, Memory Lane..."Obama's Bad Pick: A Former [Cable Industry] Lobbyist at the FCC" [View all]Maven
(10,533 posts)6. "Senators Urge FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to ‘Move Quickly’ to Preserve ‘Open Internet'"
Five U.S. senators have sent a letter to FCC chairman Tom Wheeler in which they call on him to act with expediency to come up with a plan after the D.C. Circuit Court overturned the agencys Net neutrality rules last month.
The Democratic senators Ron Wyden of Oregon, Edward Markey of Massachusetts, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Al Franken of Minnesota urged Wheeler to quickly adopt enforceable rules to prevent the blocking and discrimination of Internet traffic.
But Verizon challenged the rules, claiming that the agency didnt have the authority to impose them. The D.C. Circuit did support the FCCs ability to regulate Internet providers, but found fault with the way that it went about doing it. The judges ruled that the FCC was treating Internet providers as common carriers, akin to a landline phone company, without explicitly classifying them as such.
...
Wheeler has not said whether he will seek an appeal of the ruling or attempt to devise a set of new rules. He has hinted at taking a case-by-case approach, with speculation on Wall Street that the agency would come up with a set of industry standards that would essentially put Internet providers on notice for any anti-competitive behavior.
The Democratic senators Ron Wyden of Oregon, Edward Markey of Massachusetts, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Al Franken of Minnesota urged Wheeler to quickly adopt enforceable rules to prevent the blocking and discrimination of Internet traffic.
But Verizon challenged the rules, claiming that the agency didnt have the authority to impose them. The D.C. Circuit did support the FCCs ability to regulate Internet providers, but found fault with the way that it went about doing it. The judges ruled that the FCC was treating Internet providers as common carriers, akin to a landline phone company, without explicitly classifying them as such.
...
Wheeler has not said whether he will seek an appeal of the ruling or attempt to devise a set of new rules. He has hinted at taking a case-by-case approach, with speculation on Wall Street that the agency would come up with a set of industry standards that would essentially put Internet providers on notice for any anti-competitive behavior.
There were multiple actions Wheeler could have taken in response to the ruling. Reclassifying Internet providers was one. Appealing was another. Devising a new set of rules that didn't completely cave to industry demands was yet another. But the ruling provides a convenient cover for the end result doesn't it? Certainly for certain useful apologists for the administration.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ahh, Memory Lane..."Obama's Bad Pick: A Former [Cable Industry] Lobbyist at the FCC" [View all]
Maven
Apr 2014
OP
So bad that Warren, Sanders, and Franken voted for him, unreservedly? Your OP is facile, because
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#1
Apparently, Sanders kept an open mind, kept his promise, and met with Wheeler and voted for him....
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#3
"Senators Urge FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to ‘Move Quickly’ to Preserve ‘Open Internet'"
Maven
Apr 2014
#6
I asked on another thread just how the reclassification was going to survive the same court...since
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#7
Yes--they did...10 years ago. In the 2002 case. So now, kindly explain to me how the FCC, as
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#12
Correct, the FCC classified ISPs as an "information service", not a telecom...EXACTLY as I said
Maven
Apr 2014
#13
Yes--it actually does need a legal reason to change its own rules. That's how a democracy works.
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#14
I understand you backing down. But I really would like for you to tell us all exactly the legal
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#17
I'm not backing down at all. You're simply wrong, you don't understand how to read the decision
Maven
Apr 2014
#18
Again...tell me the legal justification for the rule change. It's a pretty simple question, and you
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#20
see e.g. NATIONAL CABLE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION ET AL v. BRAND X INTERNET SERVICES ET AL
Maven
Apr 2014
#22
What? You've cited an opinion where SCOTUS agrees that the classification of "information services"
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#23
Um, no. Your problem is that you still haven't provided a legal basis for changing the
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#25
If there are plenty of legal arguments, then would you please LIST THEM?????
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#28
I'll jump in here: the FCC does not have "complete discretion" to change a previous position
onenote
Apr 2014
#32
LOL. It's so refreshing to read the words of people like Sanders and Warren
Cali_Democrat
Apr 2014
#8
Nice article where the Republicans express their dislike of Wheeler for proposing more regulations..
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#15
Indeed--and Wheeler proposed regulations against AT&T when they tried to merge. The fact
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#21
And once again The Group sides with Corp-America. The FCC just another tool for Corp-America.
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#29
The problem is, Josh, andyou have captured it, is that there's the 2002 directive. Plus the
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#35
Obama? Favoring corporate interests over those of his electorate, in one of his picks!?
villager
Apr 2014
#26