Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Thu Apr 24, 2014, 04:09 AM Apr 2014

Obama pledges Net neutrality laws if elected president [View all]

If elected president, Barack Obama plans to prioritize, well, barring broadband providers like AT&T and Comcast from prioritizing Internet content.

Affixing his signature to federal Net neutrality rules would be high on the list during his first year in the Oval Office, the junior senator from Illinois said during an interactive forum Monday afternoon with the popular contender put on by MTV and MySpace at Coe College in Iowa.


Sen. Barack Obama
Net neutrality, of course, is the idea that broadband operators shouldn't be allowed to block or degrade Internet content and services--or charge content providers an extra fee for speedier delivery or more favorable placement.

The question, selected through an online video contest, was posed via video by small-business owner and former AT&T engineer Joe Niederberger, a member of the liberal advocacy group MoveOn.org. He asked Obama: "Would you make it a priority in your first year of office to reinstate Net neutrality as the law of the land? And would you pledge to only appoint FCC commissioners that support open Internet principles like Net neutrality?"

"The answer is yes," Obama replied. "I am a strong supporter of Net neutrality."

He went on to explain the issue briefly: "What you've been seeing is some lobbying that says that the servers and the various portals through which you're getting information over the Internet should be able to be gatekeepers and to charge different rates to different Web sites...so you could get much better quality from the Fox News site and you'd be getting rotten service from the mom and pop sites," he went on. "And that I think destroys one of the best things about the Internet--which is that there is this incredible equality there."

Obama added that companies like Google may not have gotten started without a "level playing field" and pledged to make sure Net neutrality "is the principle that my FCC commissioners are applying as we move forward."


http://www.cnet.com/news/obama-pledges-net-neutrality-laws-if-elected-president/



FCC proposal would destroy net neutrality




The Federal Communication Commission's proposal for new net neutrality rules will allow internet service providers to charge companies for preferential treatment, effectively undermining the concept of net neutrality, according to The Wall Street Journal. The rules will allow providers to charge companies for preferential treatment so long as they offer that treatment to all interested parties on "commercially reasonable" terms, with the FCC deciding whether the terms are reasonable on a case-by-case basis. Providers will reportedly not be able to block individual websites, however.

The goal of net neutrality rules is to prevent service providers from discriminating between different content, allowing all types of data and all companies' data to be treated equally. While it appears that outright blocking of individual services won't be allowed, the Journal reports that some forms of discrimination will be allowed, though that will apparently not include slowing down websites. In response, FCC chairman Tom Wheeler issued a statement that reports of net neutrality's demise are "flat out wrong." Nonetheless, allowing some websites to pay for preferentially treatment would inherently favor larger, more successful companies.

A MAJOR CHANGE TO THE MEANING OF "OPEN INTERNET"

The actual draft of the proposed rules has not yet been released, but the FCC did release a framework of the rules back in February. An FCC spokesperson confirmed to The Verge that the proposal does include the ability for service providers to negotiate with individual companies, so long as all content is delivered at a baseline level of service. "Exactly what the baseline level of service would be, the construction of a 'commercially reasonable' standard, and the manner in which disputes would be resolved, are all among the topics on which the FCC will be seeking comment," the spokesperson said.



http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/23/5644246/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules-draft-coming-in-may


In Policy Shift, F.C.C. Will Allow a Web Fast Lane



WASHINGTON — The principle that all Internet content should be treated equally as it flows through cables and pipes to consumers looks all but dead.

The Federal Communications Commission said on Wednesday that it would propose new rules that allow companies like Disney, Google or Netflix to pay Internet service providers like Comcast and Verizon for special, faster lanes to send video and other content to their customers.

The proposed changes would affect what is known as net neutrality — the idea that no providers of legal Internet content should face discrimination in providing offerings to consumers, and that users should have equal access to see any legal content they choose.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We techies have been screaming about this for years Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #1
Regulatory capture by the Oligarths Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #2
I don't doubt it Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #4
One chart describes it all Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #7
campaign as a democrat,then when you get elected.... nt msongs Apr 2014 #3
Well that's a ''compasionist conservate'' way of putting it Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #5
So... jberryhill Apr 2014 #14
Yep. I'm furious about this. NC_Nurse Apr 2014 #6
Pretty soon We might not be able to find Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #8
Where is your comment from January? jberryhill Apr 2014 #15
OBAMA’S BAD PICK: A FORMER LOBBYIST AT THE F.C.C. Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #18
Nonetheless how do you explain the NN rules which were enacted? jberryhill Apr 2014 #22
Obama won't put up with this. We need to elect him. Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #25
It wasn't his appointee who struck down the rules jberryhill Apr 2014 #28
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Apr 2014 #9
Damn, I wish that guy had been elected. Scuba Apr 2014 #10
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Apr 2014 #41
Another promise kept n2doc Apr 2014 #11
Where were you when the previous rules were made? jberryhill Apr 2014 #24
So, where's teh Y? Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #30
It is between teh W and teh Z jberryhill Apr 2014 #36
So you don't actually have a response Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #37
The FCC can at any time choose to reclassify broadband as a public utility Dragonfli Apr 2014 #45
It's just another lame "Obama bad" meme treestar Apr 2014 #44
you never loved him anyway... KG Apr 2014 #12
Federal Appeal Court Strikes Net Neutrality Rule jberryhill Apr 2014 #13
I guess he had good lawyers Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #16
Yes, that's how a case gets to an appeals court jberryhill Apr 2014 #20
Again, where is the attempt to minimise harm? Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #31
What is the subject of this thread? jberryhill Apr 2014 #33
Um, maybe Prophet 451 Apr 2014 #38
Such facts don't help spread the outrage. So they tend to get overlooked. JoePhilly Apr 2014 #17
So was his pick of Wheeler Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #19
Ah, Wheeler made the court do it jberryhill Apr 2014 #23
It's kind of hard to overlook... jberryhill Apr 2014 #21
Here is a quote from your link.... dotymed Apr 2014 #27
Once again... jberryhill Apr 2014 #32
Outstanding response ... and it applies in situations beyond this situation. JoePhilly Apr 2014 #34
First of all dotymed Apr 2014 #39
I'm sure the OP will be edited to include the missing information anytime now... Chathamization Apr 2014 #42
Net Neutrality Demsrule86 Apr 2014 #26
This thread is not about net neutrality jberryhill Apr 2014 #35
The FCC — under the leadership of former Chairman Julius Genachowski Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #29
Exactly.... Recommend this post. KoKo Apr 2014 #40
... warrprayer Apr 2014 #43
"Change that we can believe in" vs the change that we can see. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #46
Too bad we didn't elect that guy as President ... 1000words Apr 2014 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama pledges Net neutral...