Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
Thu Apr 24, 2014, 10:46 PM Apr 2014

Why does the FCC and Government Hate the idea of a free Internet? [View all]

I'm not a conspiracy theorist. But I must say it is immensely depressing and angering that the FCC, the Courts and the f'in Congress want to kill something good.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/04/24

Unless Defeated, New FCC Rules Will Put 'Stake in Internet's Heart'
Critics of the new rules say that this could be the moment the internet as we know it will die if the people do not rise to its defense
- Jon Queally, staff writer

The death of net neutrality—which has governed the equal treatment of content since the internet was created—will create, say critics, a tiered internet that allows major internet service providers like Comcast and Verizon to cut special and lucrative deals with content providers who can afford to pay for special "fast lanes." The result will be an internet that will incentivize slower traffic by ISPs and the creation of privatized, corporate-controlled "toll-roads" that will come to dominate a once fair and free environment.

“If it goes forward, this capitulation will represent Washington at its worst.” —Todd O’Boyle, Common Cause

As reported by various outlets, the new rules have been circulated by FCC chairman Tom Wheeler to the other members of the commission and will be officially announced on Thursday.

"With this proposal, the FCC is aiding and abetting the largest ISPs in their efforts to destroy the open Internet," said Craig Aaron, president of the media advocacy group Free Press. "Giving ISPs the green light to implement pay-for-priority schemes will be a disaster for startups, nonprofits and everyday Internet users who cannot afford these unnecessary tolls. These users will all be pushed onto the Internet dirt road, while deep pocketed Internet companies enjoy the benefits of the newly created fast lanes." .....
MORE

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tell them how you feel. octoberlib Apr 2014 #1
I intend to -- but fat lot of good it will do Armstead Apr 2014 #3
They don't care what the people feel. This was inevitable. They got control of the media, but then sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #5
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #18
+ infinity. 99Forever Apr 2014 #21
Yes, they don't care. And let's not sugarcoat the truth. The President works for them, not us, woo me with science Apr 2014 #26
The head of the FCC appointed by Obama, is a former Cable Lobbyist and a Republican sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #33
There's a tree outside that would listen better, LOL Corruption Inc Apr 2014 #16
Small interest groups prevail over public interest even when public losses outweigh private gains Amak8 Apr 2014 #2
The goddamn officials we elect know what's going on Armstead Apr 2014 #4
There's an election coming up. Time to let them know what we expect them to do or don't expect sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #7
You might want to look again at the story. The NYT has already corrected theirs because the info okaawhatever Apr 2014 #6
They NYT is credible? Since when? Speaking of propaganda, were you around when they sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #9
Word. NYT is the same crew that sat on "warrantless wiretapping" until after 04 elections KeepItReal Apr 2014 #14
+1! Enthusiast Apr 2014 #19
Common Dreams : after your precious bodily fluids bobduca Apr 2014 #20
As bad as this is mindwalker_i Apr 2014 #8
I'm in favor of net neutrality. Jenoch Apr 2014 #10
free as in open,accessible and affordable to everyone Armstead Apr 2014 #11
I'm in favor of that. Jenoch Apr 2014 #13
Not what this is about RobertEarl Apr 2014 #17
We already pay for internet service. What is your point? sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #22
Don't divert Armstead Apr 2014 #30
Radio is free, TV used to be free before cable and satellite but that was when we had a sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #34
I took the headline literally, as in 'free' internet service. Jenoch Apr 2014 #36
"I'm not certain 'free' internet is a good idea. " why? n/t jtuck004 Apr 2014 #15
The quality of service will likely be terrible. Jenoch Apr 2014 #24
The people who would look to make money from it would lose, and they won't let jtuck004 Apr 2014 #25
If the profit is taken out of a particular industry, it will die. Jenoch Apr 2014 #28
But not if you take the theft out, and that is the problem. Charges for no value, or less jtuck004 Apr 2014 #29
The FCC is following the court ruling. joshcryer Apr 2014 #12
So does the FCC, the White House and Congress Armstead Apr 2014 #31
The internet is far from free FarCenter Apr 2014 #23
And that's NOT a reason to consciouly make it worse Armstead Apr 2014 #32
Then why change it? The way it is allows those who want to profit from using it to do so. sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #35
Freedom has a price...check with the corporations and congress for price lists. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why does the FCC and Gove...