Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PIKETTY ON FIRE: Bookstores Scramble For Copies Of Wealth Epic [View all]dionysus
(26,467 posts)34. i partially agree. While OWS did bring more awareness to income inequality, and offshoots are doing
great things with their project paying off peoples medical debts, it isn't as if nobody knew about the problem of wealth inequality before.
as a matter of fact, right here on DU 12 years ago we were all talking about this fabulous article by the wonderful Krugman entitled "For Richer";
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/20/magazine/for-richer.html
I.The Disappearing Middle
When I was a teenager growing up on Long Island, one of my favorite excursions was a trip to see the great Gilded Age mansions of the North Shore. Those mansions weren't just pieces of architectural history. They were monuments to a bygone social era, one in which the rich could afford the armies of servants needed to maintain a house the size of a European palace. By the time I saw them, of course, that era was long past. Almost none of the Long Island mansions were still private residences. Those that hadn't been turned into museums were occupied by nursing homes or private schools.
For the America I grew up in -- the America of the 1950's and 1960's -- was a middle-class society, both in reality and in feel. The vast income and wealth inequalities of the Gilded Age had disappeared. Yes, of course, there was the poverty of the underclass -- but the conventional wisdom of the time viewed that as a social rather than an economic problem. Yes, of course, some wealthy businessmen and heirs to large fortunes lived far better than the average American. But they weren't rich the way the robber barons who built the mansions had been rich, and there weren't that many of them. The days when plutocrats were a force to be reckoned with in American society, economically or politically, seemed long past.
Daily experience confirmed the sense of a fairly equal society. The economic disparities you were conscious of were quite muted. Highly educated professionals -- middle managers, college teachers, even lawyers -- often claimed that they earned less than unionized blue-collar workers. Those considered very well off lived in split-levels, had a housecleaner come in once a week and took summer vacations in Europe. But they sent their kids to public schools and drove themselves to work, just like everyone else.
But that was long ago. The middle-class America of my youth was another country.
We are now living in a new Gilded Age, as extravagant as the original. Mansions have made a comeback. Back in 1999 this magazine profiled Thierry Despont, the ''eminence of excess,'' an architect who specializes in designing houses for the superrich. His creations typically range from 20,000 to 60,000 square feet; houses at the upper end of his range are not much smaller than the White House. Needless to say, the armies of servants are back, too. So are the yachts. Still, even J.P. Morgan didn't have a Gulfstream.
I'm not dissing OWS, but plenty of us knew about this problem a long, long time ago. The Krugamn article is a great (but depressing read). When I was cleaning out my desk our office shut down, I found the hard copy I had printed. I might post it as an OP.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's exciting to see people thirsty for new economic possibilities and philosophy.
myrna minx
Apr 2014
#5
i partially agree. While OWS did bring more awareness to income inequality, and offshoots are doing
dionysus
Apr 2014
#34
For those who have friends waiting for a copy, or whose interest is piqued by the Piketty book
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#9
Helpful list, thanks. I would add "The Spirit Level" to it perhaps.
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2014
#16
Yes, I saw that mentioned on the inequality site. Thanks for adding it. Hopefully the success
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#23
This reflects the ability for considered critical analysis of the American public.
FarCenter
Apr 2014
#15
Not Just Amazon Coservative Reviewers Are Scared, Check Out These... To Name Two:
WillyT
Apr 2014
#20
I am savoring reading this book. I got my copy the day after it was released. The writing style is
mulsh
Apr 2014
#19
" Whatever this guy wrote must really be freaking the hell out of the righties." The truth hurts the
adirondacker
Apr 2014
#31