Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
4. Not really.
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 01:22 PM
Apr 2014

Assault rifles (even semi-automatic civilian replicas) by definition fire lower-powered cartridges than ordinary hunting rifles. If cops are worried about their ballistic vests being penetrated (thus the "need" for armored vehicles), they have a lot more to fear from most bolt-action hunting rifles than an AR-15.

But I don't think any of this is about necessity anyway. It's about the insular "us vs them" cop mentality, about boys and their toys, and above all about control.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Weaponized Cops and the F...»Reply #4