Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
26. But the meta analyses ruled out causation
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 06:57 PM
Apr 2014

The way they did this was to look at rates of schizophrenia in populations relative to the rates of marijuana use.

An increase in marijuana use should lead to an increase in schizophrenia if marijuana caused schizophrenia.

This was not the case.

HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of people were involved in these meta analysis - far, far more statistical validity than any single test.

The leading pharmacologist in the UK said, in 2010:

Roger Pertwee, professor of neuropharmacology at Aberdeen University, will on Tuesday tell the British Science Festival in Birmingham that making cannabis available from licensed outlets would reduce drug-related crime and cut the risk of users moving on to more dangerous drugs.

“At the moment cannabis is in the hands of criminals,” he will say. “We are allowed to drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes. Cannabis, if it is handled properly, is not going to be more dangerous.”

Although research has shown cannabis may increase the risk of developing schizophrenia in particularly vulnerable individuals, this danger does not apply to the general population, he will say. The risk could be reduced by setting a minimum age of 21 for consuming cannabis or requiring individuals to obtain a licence to buy it.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/RainDog/23


studies from Harvard published late last year: http://www.democraticunderground.com/11701551

and a meta analysis of marijuana studies have indicated that marijuana was only a risk for schizophrenia for those with existing family histories, and, therefore, existing predisposition for schizo-affective disorder:

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2009/09/01/2673334.htm

Previous research has suggested cannabis use increases the risk of being diagnosed with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders.

This latest study, led by Dr Martin Frisher of Keele University, examined the records of 600,000 patients aged between 16 and 44, but failed to find a similar link.

"An important limitation of many studies is that they have failed to distinguish the direction of association between cannabis use and psychosis," the authors write in the latest edition of the journal Schizophrenia Research.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you for your concern trolling 4now Apr 2014 #1
Here's what NORML has to say about that: Comrade Grumpy Apr 2014 #2
Of course this will be ignored, the narrative must stand. nt. Rex Apr 2014 #14
"There is a strong association with schizophrenia. That much is proven." antiquie Apr 2014 #3
Association is NOT causation Yo_Mama Apr 2014 #20
Yes. That's what meta analysis has shown RainDog Apr 2014 #23
Right - for some people it may be causative, we don't know how to distinguish that Yo_Mama Apr 2014 #24
But the meta analyses ruled out causation RainDog Apr 2014 #26
They didn't rule out causation in indivduals Yo_Mama Apr 2014 #28
If individuals were at risk for schizo-affective disorders RainDog Apr 2014 #30
It's interesting that someone was writing about this RainDog Apr 2014 #29
Chances are, these "case studies" were couch-potatoes long before smoking weed... Cooley Hurd Apr 2014 #4
These studies are ridiculous... First of all, what kind of weed was it? SomethingFishy Apr 2014 #11
and my munchies were always for fresh whole foods like fruits & veggies eShirl Apr 2014 #12
My point is that a specialized reporting system is being suggested Yo_Mama Apr 2014 #25
taurine metabolic byproduct. hobbit709 Apr 2014 #5
Thank gawd we have prohibition to save these young people. n/t theaocp Apr 2014 #6
Here some FUD, there some FUD, everywhere some FUD FUD! Rex Apr 2014 #7
Thank you for posting this…this sounds important for anyone who wants to start young and.. Tikki Apr 2014 #8
because your physician will have as much data as went into and came out of this study: zero. Warren Stupidity Apr 2014 #15
Or he will have info… Tikki Apr 2014 #16
Or if you have early symptoms. Yo_Mama Apr 2014 #19
Yes, we need to tell our physicians everything we regularly put into our systems. Tikki Apr 2014 #22
Which it will not necessarily be if a mandatory reporting system is instituted. Yo_Mama Apr 2014 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author antiquie Apr 2014 #9
I've been smoking pot for over 30 years Politicalboi Apr 2014 #10
Exactly - some people can't eat wheat - Yo_Mama Apr 2014 #18
6 Sodas? otohara Apr 2014 #37
Thanks for posting. Union Scribe Apr 2014 #13
Good information RainDog Apr 2014 #17
paranoia, with munchies? Who knew? 2pooped2pop Apr 2014 #21
Now that pot will soon be legal everywhere the fear mongering Lint Head Apr 2014 #31
In people prone to vasoconstriction, pot has caused amputations. Yo_Mama Apr 2014 #32
For people with ulcers aspirin can cause them to bleed and death. Lint Head Apr 2014 #34
And the tobacco had absolutely no effect? Give me a break. hobbit709 Apr 2014 #36
All those reported were cigarette smokers, too RainDog Apr 2014 #38
"higher caloric intake"... Jesus Malverde Apr 2014 #33
I think the suggestion that marijuana is somehow a miracle drug that never brings harm and cures hedgehog Apr 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some info is emerging abo...»Reply #26