Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
8. X Comcast attorney is on the FCC
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 11:32 AM
Apr 2014

The backgrounds of the new FCC staff have not been reported until now.

Take Daniel Alvarez, an attorney who has long represented Comcast through the law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP. In 2010, Alvarez wrote a letter to the FCC on behalf of Comcast protesting net neutrality rules, arguing that regulators failed to appreciate “socially beneficial discrimination.” The proposed rules, Alvarez wrote in the letter co-authored with a top Comcast lobbyist named Joe Waz, should be reconsidered.

Today, someone in Comcast’s Philadelphia headquarters is probably smiling. Alvarez is now on the other side, working among a small group of legal advisors hired directly under Tom Wheeler, the new FCC Commissioner who began his job in November.

As soon as Wheeler came into office, he also announced the hiring of former Ambassador Philip Verveer as his senior counselor. A records request reveals that Verveer also worked for Comcast in the last year. In addition, he was retained by two industry groups that have worked to block net neutrality, the Wireless Association (CTIA) and the National Cable and Telecommunications Association.

In February, Matthew DelNero was brought into the agency to work specifically on net neutrality. DelNero has previously worked as an attorney for TDS Telecom, an Internet service provider that has lobbied on net neutrality, according to filings.

Around the time of Delnero’s hiring, FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, a former associate general counsel at Verizon, announced a new advisor by the name of Brendan Carr. Pai, a Republican, has criticized the open Internet regulations, calling them a “problem in search of a solution.” It should be of little surprise that Carr, Pai’s new legal hand, has worked for years as an attorney to AT&T, CenturyLink, Verizon, and the U.S. Telecom Association, a trade group that has waged war in Washington against net neutrality since 2006. A trail of online documents show that Carr worked specifically to monitor net neutrality regulations on behalf of some of his industry clients.


http://www.vice.com/read/former-comcast-and-verizon-attorneys-now-manage-the-fcc-and-are-about-to-kill-the-internet

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well that explains why I could barely connect to Netflix last fall! I hate Comcast/Xfinity. Plan txwhitedove Apr 2014 #1
I quit cable and satellite three or four years ago. Use a digital antenna picked up from radio shack 2banon Apr 2014 #28
My budget is forcing the issue too, and I warned the kids that it's about to happen. Comcast raised txwhitedove Apr 2014 #47
exactly. that' ole $19.99 turns into over a $100 a month in no time...n/t 2banon Apr 2014 #55
"Presumably, Netflix would eventually pass those fees on to its subscribers..." Hong Kong Cavalier Apr 2014 #2
And Comcast will charge users by how much bandwidth they use. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2014 #7
Comcast's 250gb/month data cap makes streaming videos in HD a risky endeavor. Hong Kong Cavalier Apr 2014 #16
Actually comcast.com got rid of its data caps some time ago lostincalifornia Apr 2014 #26
Not according to their website: Hong Kong Cavalier Apr 2014 #42
They do not have data caps in San Jose, California, as of now, and when I spoke with them a few days lostincalifornia Apr 2014 #43
Yeah...it looks like they're going to "roll out" these caps eventually. Hong Kong Cavalier Apr 2014 #44
That is the problem with monopolies. I am surprised that Uverse isn't in St. Paul, though they have lostincalifornia Apr 2014 #46
Aero isn't in distribution networks. It delivers via other ISPs. Google Fiber is a distribution net. FarCenter Apr 2014 #48
Right about aero I was mixing metaphors, my point was that there lostincalifornia Apr 2014 #50
To connect up a few million homes at a couple thousand per home means you have to be big. FarCenter Apr 2014 #52
sure it is, which is why it should be regulated lostincalifornia Apr 2014 #54
The city applied to be a test market for Google Fiber. Hong Kong Cavalier Apr 2014 #49
And Comcast will sell their streaming for less. Eventually Netflix will sell out rhett o rick Apr 2014 #11
I'm going back to dial up BBS. L0oniX Apr 2014 #3
Amen TroglodyteScholar Apr 2014 #19
Watch out for them port sniffers. L0oniX Apr 2014 #21
It is a little ironic Netflix got "throttled." DirkGently Apr 2014 #4
Netflix still throttles Auggie Apr 2014 #14
10%...15%...20%....22%...23%...24%....25%....25%...25%... NuclearDem Apr 2014 #5
Useful; but the least of my worries. snot Apr 2014 #6
X Comcast attorney is on the FCC Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #8
Would someone pls tell Obama, snot Apr 2014 #9
No he's hiring rivals from each industry not party. bobduca Apr 2014 #17
He knows that better than many of us, I expect. n/t jtuck004 Apr 2014 #23
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #57
So fucking corrupt it's sickening..... blackspade Apr 2014 #20
It's corruption from sea to shining sea. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #58
Although your response is factual, it has exactly NOTHING to do with the graph... MohRokTah Apr 2014 #35
It involves Comcast and its my thread Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #38
The graph has nothing to do with Net Neutrality in the first place. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #40
The issue with Netflix is peering between Comcast and the tier 1 providers. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #10
You sound like you know what you're talking about; could you explain that in layman's terms, please? Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2014 #25
Not really, but this guy on DK does an outstanding job of explaining it MohRokTah Apr 2014 #29
k&r thanks for posting. Looks like "net neutrality" is another subject boycotted by rhett o rick Apr 2014 #12
If the graph pointed out in the OP was about Net Neutrality, you'd see a lot more tech savvy people MohRokTah Apr 2014 #34
My point is that there is a very vocal group here boycotting net neutrality threads. rhett o rick Apr 2014 #36
I doubt that. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #37
To be fair, I was told to get my head out of my ass when I criticized the ruling. djean111 Apr 2014 #45
business scams. business scams... BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2014 #13
my Verizon DSL has been HORRIBLE slow with Netflix lately, especially if I have google logged on. Sunlei Apr 2014 #15
Not really such a hilarious graph when it's real, though, is it? Jamastiene Apr 2014 #18
Not really related to Net Neutrality, though. It's due to peering agreements between Comcast and... MohRokTah Apr 2014 #30
I've seen this firsthand. Comcast extortion. KeepItReal Apr 2014 #22
NOT Comcast extortion. COGENT Extortion MohRokTah Apr 2014 #31
I would like to see the same chart for other content providers ThoughtCriminal Apr 2014 #24
You'd be wrong. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #32
This is all about network peering arrangements FarCenter Apr 2014 #27
^^^^^ This is factual. The OP is wrong looking at it from anet neutrality viewpoint. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #33
Call the washington post Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #39
Christopher Ingraham is an idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #41
Broadband providers have a lot of incentive to slow down so that people go up a tier or six. merrily Apr 2014 #51
Makes sense madville Apr 2014 #53
This is practcally rent seeking behavior. BlindTiresias Apr 2014 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This hilarious graph of N...»Reply #8