Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Former Comcast and Verizon Attorneys Now Manage the FCC [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)35. I take issue with only one thing in your post.
There is no law that states only Republican lobbyists and former execs of the businesses that are being regulated can be appointed. It is true you only claimed a Republican must be appointed and the rest is my embellishment (before you correctly bring that up) but it is nonetheless still true.
A politically neutral person that is not the obvious inside man of the industry is always an option for any post. I do not recall Bush having no choice but to appoint a Democrat with a history of regulation as opposed to lobbying even when we held both houses.
If we pretend that the only thing that can be done is to hire foxes to guard henhouses the practice will never change.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wait I think I am getting it. This mess may possibly reflect badly on the president, even though
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#2
If the threads allegedly about net neutrality were actually about net neutrality
MohRokTah
Apr 2014
#21
Let me see if I got your rational correct. If the OP was written different then more
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#23
I dont think you will get one here. The other side doesnt have much conviction. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#6
I disagree. Per usual, they're just chopping at the bit. You watch...
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2014
#11
So is the conclusion that we cant blame these decisions on the lobbyists? nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#31
We need to stop this corporate takeover of our government. Perhaps by Amendment, if necessary.
silvershadow
Apr 2014
#37