Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Sat Apr 26, 2014, 03:33 PM Apr 2014

Why Would Obama Push A Trade Deal That Would Cut Pay Of 90% Of Workers? [View all]

By Dave Johnson
April 26, 2014

Research concludes that if you're making less than $87,000 per year (the current 90th percentile wage), the Trans-Pacific Partnership would mean a pay cut. But that's fine for corporations who want this treaty.




President Obama is in Asia, partly to "reassure" partner countries that the U.S. is a strong ally and partly to push the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Both are to counter China's growing influence. While TPP is being sold as a "strategic" countermeasure to China, like other so-called "trade" agreements TPP does not help American workers; it hurts them.

Obama In Asia Pushing TPP

President Obama is in Japan as part of his "pivot to Asia" tour of Pacific countries. He is also visiting South Korea, Malaysia and the Philippines. The trip is meant to demonstrate U.S. diplomatic and economic efforts toward Pacific nations to counterbalance China's increasing influence in the region. Part of this effort is a big push to get TPP negotiations back on track and completed.

TPP is a massive "trade" treaty between Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam. "Trade" is in quotes because only five of the treaty's 29 chapters actually deal with trade. Others set rules on investment, set limits on the ability of governments to regulate corporations, restrict a government's ability to spend its own tax dollars on goods made in that country (such as "Buy America" procurement policies) and other things well beyond the usual scope of what would be considered a trade agreement. This leads many to claim that the treaty is really about limiting the ability of governments to reign in the giant corporations. (For those not familiar with TPP, read all about it in ourfuture.org's TPP section.)

more

http://crooksandliars.com/2014/04/why-would-obama-push-trade-deal-would-cut

simple. $$$$$$$$ for his backers. $$$$$$$$ for him after he leaves the Presidency. Just like Bubba. And Shrub, and Poppy Bush….

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Because he and the backers of this trade deal make well over $87,000 per year Autumn Apr 2014 #1
Gains from Trade? The Net Effect of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement on U.S. Wages Ichingcarpenter Apr 2014 #2
If all those gains go to the 10%, screw it. n/t n2doc Apr 2014 #3
Excellent stuff. +1 n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #12
because it it what his bosses want Skittles Apr 2014 #4
Yep... awoke_in_2003 Apr 2014 #6
so he can push for a minimum wage increase stupidicus Apr 2014 #5
More like 1 forward and two back. bvar22 Apr 2014 #18
he can put all the lipstick in the world on this PIG noiretextatique Apr 2014 #22
Must read post, thanks:) grahamhgreen Apr 2014 #23
yep stupidicus Apr 2014 #29
And if Democrats nominate and elect Hillary Clinton, the TPP is a sure thing. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #7
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #8
+100 n/t whathehell Apr 2014 #16
Ask Obama. Only he knows but whether you get a truthful answer is another matter. Boomerproud Apr 2014 #9
Oh you people just don't understand Nth dementional chess. progressoid Apr 2014 #10
Because we're not the constituents. We're the resources that the constituents exploit. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2014 #11
I feel like a bag of rice. Curmudgeoness Apr 2014 #17
Wall Street ueber Alles. Octafish Apr 2014 #13
The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us cantbeserious Apr 2014 #14
post-presidential office: $.5 million speaking fees at corporate "retreats" Divernan Apr 2014 #15
For the same reason the CIA has done the following: nationalize the fed Apr 2014 #19
This Should End The "Playing Chess" Mantra colsohlibgal Apr 2014 #20
because the people who'd shut down the country's 200 biggest cities had a Pub done it MisterP Apr 2014 #21
oh, c'mon guys. why the poutrage? it hasn't happened...yet! KG Apr 2014 #24
It pretty obvious if you look at the markets. Jesus Malverde Apr 2014 #25
Because both parties janlyn Apr 2014 #26
What's Trade got to Do With It? reACTIONary Apr 2014 #27
As Krugman would say, smart and serious people that Obama has surrounded himself think this is a great idea Paulie Apr 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Would Obama Push A Tr...