Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NET NEUTRALITY Supported By President Obama [View all]S
TATEMENT BY FCC CHAIRMAN TOM WHEELER ON
THE FCCS OPEN INTERNET RULES
FEBRUARY 19, 2014
In its Verizon v. FCC decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
invited the Commission to act to preserve a free and open Internet. I intend to accept that invitation by
proposing rules that will meet the courts test for preventing improper blocking of and discrimination
among Internet traffic, ensuring genuine transparency in how Internet Service Providers manage traffic,
and enhancing competition. Preserving the Internet as an open platform for innovation and expression
while providing certainty and predictability in the marketplace is an important responsibility of this
agency.
The D.C. Circuit ruled that the FCC has the legal authority to issue enforceable rules of the road to
preserve Internet freedom and openness. It affirmed that Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of
1996 gives the FCC authority to encourage broadband deployment by, among other things, removing
barriers to infrastructure deployment, encouraging innovation, and promoting competition. The court
recognized the importance of ensuring that so-called edge providers, those that use the network to
deliver goods and services, can reach people who use the Internet. And it upheld the Commission's
judgment that Internet freedom encourages broadband investment and that its absence could ultimately
inhibit broadband deployment.
More at http://www.fcc.gov/document/statement-fcc-chairman-tom-wheeler-fccs-open-internet-rules
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, the problem is that the January ruling allowed just that...a two tiered system. Take a look
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#16
No--it really doesn't. If you have a citation from the court decision that explains
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#29
I still don't understand your point....can you clarify what you are saying? nt
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#33
Intelligent people don't cater to childish games, you should know that by now. What you are doing
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#43
Sssshhhh, you're not supposed to be pointing these out. What you are supposed to do
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#47
Wheeler is actually a pretty decent guy, and very knowledgeable. But the problem we face in all
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#24
We aren't there yet but within 10 years reasonable broadband should be a commodity....
Swede Atlanta
Apr 2014
#18
I think you missed the boat. "I have no problem with the idea that the more you use, whether it is
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#20
Ironic to have so many videos on a thread about the FCC's decisions on net neutrality.
merrily
Apr 2014
#39
*Obama could have chosen a fierce advocate for net neutrality to head the FCC. He did not.
Jefferson23
Apr 2014
#42
We certainly can't rely on the supreme court to rule in favor of consumers/regular citizens.
Enthusiast
Apr 2014
#51
No, we can't..my purpose to post the info was more about clearing up any confusion anyone
Jefferson23
Apr 2014
#54