Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)

8. Excellent point.

Reply to Dragonfli (Reply #4)

Sat Apr 26, 2014, 06:09 PM

Apr 2014

Also keeping pot on the black market keeps the price artificially high. Someone higher up the food chain profits from that. Maybe the CIA as has been rumored.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gilded Age vs. NOW: Instead of Carnegie founding libraries-we have Trump yelling at people on TV [View all] kpete Apr 2014 OP

Thanks for posting and I was ok with the post right up to this point, rhett o rick Apr 2014 #1

I wouldn't mind billionaires having so much influence if today's billionaires weren't so worthless. eppur_se_muova Apr 2014 #2

Worse than that, many are actively trying to make things worse n2doc Apr 2014 #3

They are well on their way to achieving their aim. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #7

Yup. While the Gilded Age was extreme in its inequality, the rich actually did invest in cities... Drunken Irishman Apr 2014 #5

Small point to quibble over Dragonfli Apr 2014 #4

Excellent point. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #8

OK, if I buy the idea the 1% really are the "job creators" . . . Brigid Apr 2014 #6

Well said. Kath1 Apr 2014 #9