General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]AcertainLiz
(863 posts)But I think even you should know how silly that is. So the first two points aren't relevant.
"3) Kids have to go to school but their parents have choices where to send them. "
But do the kids get to decide? What if the kids don't ever want to go to school? You know some actually think kids should be given this choice? If you think this, fine, your argument is consistent, but if you think compulsory things like that should exist that inevitably shape and effect peoples lives to a great extent, I don't think your argument is consistent at all. I hope you can see why I have a problem with your argument here.
" a nattering drill sargent and no, you have no right to tell me where my body and mind goes after K-12. "
Not sure if that should be a compliment or an insult? But regardless, you prove my point. You don't actually object as you say you do, you just draw the line differently. Okay, but that's just subjective. I think the line should be moved up a bit. How is it any different?
So...maybe?