Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What Obama's FCC is about to do to the Internet is similar to what Clinton did to broadcasting in 96 [View all]"Oh... so they caught some small fry?"
...what does that have to do with what I posted?
The much ballyhooed Dodd Frank Bill:
1) did nothing to impose any limits on the growth the "Too Big to Fails"
2) did nothing to Re-establish a FireWall between Investment & Commercial Banks
3) will NOT prevent another Melt Down & Taxpayer Bail Out
4) does NOT regulate the High Risk Financial Inventions that caused the last MeltDown
1) did nothing to impose any limits on the growth the "Too Big to Fails"
2) did nothing to Re-establish a FireWall between Investment & Commercial Banks
3) will NOT prevent another Melt Down & Taxpayer Bail Out
4) does NOT regulate the High Risk Financial Inventions that caused the last MeltDown
More say-anything nonsense.
Banks Ordered to Add Capital to Limit Risks
By PETER EAVIS
Updated, 9:08 p.m. | Federal regulators on Tuesday approved a simple rule that could do more to rein in Wall Street than most other parts of a sweeping overhaul that has descended on the biggest banks since the financial crisis.
The rule increases to 5 percent, from roughly 3 percent, a threshold called the leverage ratio, which measures the amount of capital that a bank holds against its assets. The requirement more stringent than that for Wall Streets rivals in Europe and Asia could force the eight biggest banks in the United States to find as much as an additional $68 billion to put their operations on firmer financial footing, according to regulators estimates.
Faced with that potentially onerous bill, Wall Street titans are expected to pare back some of their riskiest activities, including trading in credit-default swaps, the financial instruments that destabilized the system during the financial crisis...some regulators and advocates for tougher financial regulation said, the new rule is a more straightforward tool that will be harder to evade and easier to enforce than many of the new regulations covering the sprawling, complex businesses of banking. Capital is important to banks because it acts as a buffer for potential losses that might otherwise sink an institution.
<...>
Senator Sherrod Brown, Democrat of Ohio, who has introduced a bill with Senator David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, that envisions higher leverage ratios than those approved on Tuesday, said, Todays rule is a major step forward, but we can and must do more.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/regulators-set-to-approve-new-capital-rule
By PETER EAVIS
Updated, 9:08 p.m. | Federal regulators on Tuesday approved a simple rule that could do more to rein in Wall Street than most other parts of a sweeping overhaul that has descended on the biggest banks since the financial crisis.
The rule increases to 5 percent, from roughly 3 percent, a threshold called the leverage ratio, which measures the amount of capital that a bank holds against its assets. The requirement more stringent than that for Wall Streets rivals in Europe and Asia could force the eight biggest banks in the United States to find as much as an additional $68 billion to put their operations on firmer financial footing, according to regulators estimates.
Faced with that potentially onerous bill, Wall Street titans are expected to pare back some of their riskiest activities, including trading in credit-default swaps, the financial instruments that destabilized the system during the financial crisis...some regulators and advocates for tougher financial regulation said, the new rule is a more straightforward tool that will be harder to evade and easier to enforce than many of the new regulations covering the sprawling, complex businesses of banking. Capital is important to banks because it acts as a buffer for potential losses that might otherwise sink an institution.
<...>
Senator Sherrod Brown, Democrat of Ohio, who has introduced a bill with Senator David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, that envisions higher leverage ratios than those approved on Tuesday, said, Todays rule is a major step forward, but we can and must do more.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/regulators-set-to-approve-new-capital-rule
Brown, Warren Urge Fed To Address Risks Associated With Bank Ownership Of Physical Commodities
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024831309
Again:
There is no question that Dodd-Frank was a strong billthe strongest in three generations. I didnt have a chance to vote for it because I wasnt yet in the Senate, but if I could have, I would have voted for it twice.
http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf
http://www.warren.senate.gov/files/documents/AFR%20Roosevelt%20Institute%20Speech%202013-11-12.pdf
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024815727
Why Elizabeth Warren Left The GOP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024877747
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What Obama's FCC is about to do to the Internet is similar to what Clinton did to broadcasting in 96 [View all]
Armstead
Apr 2014
OP
Telecommunications Reform Act signed on February 8, 1996. Faux News begins October 7, 1996. Hmm..nt
Mnemosyne
Apr 2014
#1
The first 'episode' I watched chilled me to the bone and have rarely watched it since 1996.
Mnemosyne
Apr 2014
#8
The end result is that speech is silenced not directly by the government (too obvious a violation
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#6
It's interesting that John McCain joined Russ Feingold in voting against this crappy bill
cascadiance
Apr 2014
#61
The "Primary Purpose of Environmental Regulations is the Regulating Environmentalist"
2banon
Apr 2014
#111
And who would have imagined a Democratic president would go along with this. And Obama
quinnox
Apr 2014
#10
He talks a great game...but he sure doesn't walk his talk when it comes to taming Corporate America
Armstead
Apr 2014
#25
Yep. Clinton did some real boneheaded things, of which this (the communications act) was one.
silvershadow
Apr 2014
#18
Electing Hillary would effectively give the Clintons a THIRD presidential term.
Divernan
Apr 2014
#48
Me too -- I wish this damn country would recognize the common sense rule that...
Armstead
Apr 2014
#24
The "adults' are the people in power (or their apologists) who keep screwing us over but who....
Armstead
Apr 2014
#57
What, they pass a law, it allows banks to continue to stay too big and get bigger....
Armstead
Apr 2014
#73
"the opposition party tears into their opponent: everything he does is thus marvelous
MisterP
Apr 2014
#38
Bill Clinton repealed Glass Steagall and "proudly" signed DADT and DOMA into law. n/t
ProSense
Apr 2014
#62
Instead of simply attacking everyone who comes here to express displeasure over
NorthCarolina
Apr 2014
#77
Because the WH and Congress could reclassify and/or find ways to regulate it in the public interest
Armstead
Apr 2014
#49
Actually, Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on February 8, 1996.
Efilroft Sul
Apr 2014
#79
Yes I forsee a lucrative career as a corporate "advisor" and speaker ahead for President Obama
Armstead
Apr 2014
#85
I read this and never understand what the personal implications will be. Someone pretend you are
jwirr
Apr 2014
#103
Thank you. That makes it a personal issue. I think my congress reps are against this: Franken, Amy K
jwirr
Apr 2014
#116
And don't forget: In the first place, the airwaves on which the radio and TV stations
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#107