Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

longship

(40,416 posts)

17. Do you mean other than the fact that she has specifically dismissed such speculations?

Reply to rhett o rick (Reply #16)

Mon Apr 28, 2014, 10:19 AM

Apr 2014

Unfortunately, some see Warren as a prevaricator, who says she has no interest in the presidency, but who is somehow deceiving.

I have nothing else to say about that. The argument is what it is. One can either reject it and see Warren as an honest broker, or one can view Warren as some sort of a devious political person.

Not to make a straw man here, but what is your claim? That when she has repeatedly stated that she is not interested in being president that she is not being truthful?

I like Senator Warren too much to take that stance.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Elizabeth Warren's Own Book Makes The Case She Should Run For President [View all] marmar Apr 2014 OP

Now, that's funny. The Los Angeles Times review makes just the opposite case. Behold: CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #1

But she keeps denying she's running with ambiguous language... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2014 #8

How all her words says that she is not interested. longship Apr 2014 #2

Hillary Clinton said repeatedly she'd ruled out running in 2016 MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #3

Now you are just making shit up, Manny. longship Apr 2014 #5

Are you always so rude? MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #7

Well, of the links within the article, all are pretty old. longship Apr 2014 #9

Disagreeing is one thing MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #11

I stand by my claim. longship Apr 2014 #12

So you say Clinton-Sachs "changed her mind". Hmm. Is she the only one that is afforded rhett o rick Apr 2014 #13

Well, Warren has been consistent, and insistent. longship Apr 2014 #14

You do yourself a great disfavor saying statements like this, rhett o rick Apr 2014 #16

Do you mean other than the fact that she has specifically dismissed such speculations? longship Apr 2014 #17

Situations change and people change their minds, esp in politics. rhett o rick Apr 2014 #18

oh puleeze. virtually every presidential candidate in recent history (certainly in my memory) magical thyme Apr 2014 #4

You'll see. longship Apr 2014 #6

+1...nt SidDithers Apr 2014 #10

du rec. xchrom Apr 2014 #15