General Discussion

FBaggins

(28,677 posts)

10. There you go again

Mon Apr 28, 2014, 10:12 AM

Apr 2014

You're simply not entitled to your own reality.

Nothing in that post bears any resemblance to the real world. Plutonium isn't "explosive" in that sense... nor is it "so volatile" that it can "blow thru its cask"... nor is WIPP a storage site for "plutonium that was too volatile to be used in weapons".

You should try actually looking up what materials qualify for storage at WIPP. You seem to think that there are physical chunks of plutonium being stored there... but that's nonsense. That isn't what TRU (transuranic waste) is - it's clothing/tools/materials that are themselves contaminated with tiny amounts of plutonium (etc).

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Paper: WIPP workers ''not permitted to speak'' [View all] DeSwiss Apr 2014 OP

bullshit NMDemDist2 Apr 2014 #1

Quoting directly from an area NM newspaper is fear-mongering, eh? DeSwiss Apr 2014 #3

Those are some heavy quotes RobertEarl Apr 2014 #2

Yep. DeSwiss Apr 2014 #4

bravo sir...bravo backwoodsbob Apr 2014 #5

Sure RobertEarl Apr 2014 #6

what evidence do you have of this? backwoodsbob Apr 2014 #7

Not that I expect it'll make any difference..... DeSwiss Apr 2014 #8

Not that I expect it'll make any difference... but that's nonsense. FBaggins Apr 2014 #9

That isn't how a nuclear explosion works at all. FBaggins Apr 2014 #11

There you go again FBaggins Apr 2014 #10

You don't know what you are saying RobertEarl Apr 2014 #12

How ironic... FBaggins Apr 2014 #13

I'm curious...do you work in or for the nuclear industry? truebrit71 Apr 2014 #14

I do not now, nor have I ever FBaggins Apr 2014 #15

To answer your question... truebrit71 Apr 2014 #16

He gets his info from pro-nuke websites RobertEarl Apr 2014 #17