Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
35. Will most
Mon Apr 28, 2014, 11:44 AM
Apr 2014
White calls Occupy a “constructive failure.” Urban street protests, he says, only have a life cycle of about a month before their time is up. The encampments, the People’s Library, and the spirit of the general assemblies are all fun and games until everybody gets kicked out of the park. “It was magical thinking,” he says. For White, Occupy Wall Street challenged the core assumptions that activists have about how to achieve social change. “We believed that people’s assemblies were enough to gain political sovereignty. This turned out to not be true. To gain political sovereignty we must win elections.

...people go to the link and read the entire piece? "Elections" are key. They always were. Protests raise awareness, but they have to lead to actions, results. It's like the 70s environmental movement leading to political action. It can work in cities too.

The Revolt of the Cities

During the past 20 years, immigrants and young people have transformed the demographics of urban America. Now, they’re transforming its politics and mapping the future of liberalism.

Harold Meyerson

Pittsburgh is the perfect urban laboratory,” says Bill Peduto, the city’s new mayor. “We’re small enough to be able to do things and large enough for people to take notice.” More than its size, however, it’s Pittsburgh’s new government—Peduto and the five like-minded progressives who now constitute a majority on its city council—that is turning the city into a laboratory of democracy. In his first hundred days as mayor, Peduto has sought funding to establish universal pre-K education and partnered with a Swedish sustainable-technology fund to build four major developments with low carbon footprints and abundant affordable housing. Even before he became mayor, while still a council member, he steered to passage ordinances that mandated prevailing wages for employees on any project that received city funding and required local hiring for the jobs in the Pittsburgh Penguins’ new arena. He authored the city’s responsible-banking law, which directed government funds to those banks that lent in poor neighborhoods and away from those that didn’t.

<...>

Peduto, who is 49 years old, sees improving the lot of Pittsburgh’s new working class as his primary charge. In his city hall office, surrounded by such artifacts as a radio cabinet from the years when the city became home to the world’s first radio station, the new mayor outlined the task before him. “My grandfather, Sam Zarroli, came over in 1921 from Abruzzo,” he said. “He only had a second-grade education, but he was active in the Steel Workers Organizing Committee in its early years, and he made a good life for himself and his family. My challenge in today’s economy is how to get good jobs for people with no PhDs but with a good work ethic and GEDs. How do I get them the same kind of opportunities my grandfather had? All the mayors elected last year are asking this question.”

They are indeed. The mayoral and council class of 2013 is one of the most progressive cohorts of elected officials in recent American history. In one major city after another, newly elected officials are planning to raise the minimum wage or enact ordinances boosting wages in developments that have received city assistance. They are drafting legislation to require inner-city hiring on major projects and foster unionization in hotels, stores, and trucking. They are seeking the funds to establish universal pre-K and other programs for infants and toddlers. They are sketching the layout of new transit lines that will bring jobs and denser development to neighborhoods both poor and middle-class and reduce traffic and pollution in the bargain. They are—if they haven’t done so already—forbidding their police from cooperating with federal immigration authorities in the deportation of undocumented immigrants not convicted of felonies and requiring their police to have video or audio records of their encounters with the public. They are, in short, enacting at the municipal level many of the major policy changes that progressives have found themselves unable to enact at the federal and state levels. They also may be charting a new course for American liberalism.

New York’s Mayor Bill de Blasio has dominated the national press corps’ coverage of the new urban liberalism. His battles to establish citywide pre-K (successful but not funded, as he wished, by a dedicated tax on the wealthy), expand paid sick days (also successful), raise the minimum wage (blocked by the governor and legislature), and reform the police department’s stop-and-frisk policy (by dropping an appeal of a court order) have been extensively chronicled. But de Blasio is just one of a host of mayors elected last year who campaigned and now govern with similar populist agendas. The list also includes Pittsburgh’s Peduto, Minneapolis’s Betsy Hodges, Seattle’s Ed Murray, Boston’s Martin Walsh, Santa Fe’s Javier Gonzales...“We all ran on similar platforms,” Peduto says. “There wasn’t communication among us. It just emerged organically that way. We all faced the reality of growing disparities. The population beneath the poverty line is increasing everywhere. A lot of us were underdogs, populists, reformers, and the public was ready for us.”

- more -

http://prospect.org/article/revolt-cities

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024859982


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is, IMO, what is needed, a catalyst for change. Organization in rural areas might be the best RKP5637 Apr 2014 #1
It doesn't get any more "local" than that! arcane1 Apr 2014 #54
this guy is my hero roguevalley Apr 2014 #64
rec! SammyWinstonJack Apr 2014 #2
Kick for rural Oregon and beautiful Nehalem and Tilamook County Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #3
I second that. classof56 Apr 2014 #27
The movement has started. nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #4
I'll be watching this with interest. LWolf Apr 2014 #5
It's about time someone came up with a plan for this group. randome Apr 2014 #6
+1, n/t RKP5637 Apr 2014 #39
I kind of don't like the "occupy" name either Victor_c3 Apr 2014 #76
I definitely see the tide as turning. randome Apr 2014 #81
Maybe out there, but... pipi_k Apr 2014 #7
Trust me I get it nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #10
There is nothing like someone from California, gong to rural Oregon Jesus Malverde Apr 2014 #62
Good point! customerserviceguy Apr 2014 #78
Their "live-and-let-live attitude" included launching a massive bioterror attack against their Chathamization Apr 2014 #79
It was the Oregonians customerserviceguy Apr 2014 #94
My mistake. I was reading that with the other meaning of "put down." N/T Chathamization Apr 2014 #95
No problem customerserviceguy Apr 2014 #96
We need at least 500,000 people like him doing this. L0oniX Apr 2014 #8
I've seen people in a small town protest with signs at the courthouse Lars39 Apr 2014 #9
I doubt it, knowing my multiple local rural areas. nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #11
It's not at all the same. Example, SD County, population 3.1 million or so Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #23
A lovely man with a truly unworkable plan Bragi Apr 2014 #12
And there's also the fact pipi_k Apr 2014 #26
I admire the selfless dedication of many of these Activists, but I still believe that fighting for Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #13
Blah blah blah ... TBF Apr 2014 #16
You're right. Fixing politics is attending to symptom, not disease. ancianita Apr 2014 #30
Excellent point! The root cause issues need to be dealt with, not just treating symptoms. Too RKP5637 Apr 2014 #40
The true root cause is the poison of greed. This can only be defeated when enough people wake up and DesertDiamond Apr 2014 #69
And how do we go about getting public Le Taz Hot Apr 2014 #22
Public financing will be dealt with sooner or later nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #25
My state did it nearly 20 years ago by citizen initiative. Public financing is not a "canard". PotatoChip Apr 2014 #44
Unfortunately, there is no national initiative process Le Taz Hot Apr 2014 #47
Poor Maine needs to get rid of that absolute NUTBAG governor -- he is a disgrace to MADem Apr 2014 #55
good god don't mention lepage man.. he makes me ashamed of my home state... dionysus Apr 2014 #74
Isn't he awful? MADem Apr 2014 #83
he won my town by literally a few votes my dad told me. dionysus Apr 2014 #84
I'll bet your dad and many of his friends wishes they'd just swung by MADem Apr 2014 #86
he said he's done with politics if lepage gets in again (of course he won't,but it's dramatic ;) ) dionysus Apr 2014 #87
So your crack-pot legislators got elected NYtoBush-Drop Dead Apr 2014 #68
My 1st suggestion since the corporate owned media has been subverting our country for so long is to Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #45
And all of your suggestions Le Taz Hot Apr 2014 #48
I agree that my suggestions are not likely to Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #57
You keep complaining our politics are bought and paid for only to suggest political solutions. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #51
So you advocate giving up? Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #59
And who is going to pass your proposal? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #60
What is it you would have? From what little you said it seems that you are not going to vote and Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #61
You keep dodging this very basic question. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #63
To me, Micah White is a hero.. talking the talk and walking the walk. mountain grammy Apr 2014 #14
At minimal, he has the guts to try! And to me, that is a hero! n/t RKP5637 Apr 2014 #41
Solidarity, brother. nt TBF Apr 2014 #15
K&R Tippy Apr 2014 #17
smart. this was pretty much the strategy that the far right used Matariki Apr 2014 #18
Yes, it worked for them wonderfully, and it is a complete mystery why Nay Apr 2014 #24
It is not a mystery if you listen to party poobahs nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #34
Well that is how the right wing did it. zeemike Apr 2014 #19
And the radio and TV waves in these small communities. It's hard do be in a small community and not RKP5637 Apr 2014 #42
Definitely. KoKo Apr 2014 #46
Well they own the radio and TV stations. zeemike Apr 2014 #50
So true, the dems often look to the R's to see which way the wind is blowing and then try RKP5637 Apr 2014 #58
I agree pipoman Apr 2014 #20
One of the worst mistakes the Democrats Le Taz Hot Apr 2014 #21
Absolutely. nt ancianita Apr 2014 #31
bingo Kali Apr 2014 #32
Definitely !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Apr 2014 #43
In most rural areas they will find that the local government is already occupied. FarCenter Apr 2014 #28
That's what they said when the TeaParty started their local organizing a few years ago. Sent out jtuck004 Apr 2014 #71
As it should be. We need to reclaim our land and drive all "expert" middlemen out. Out, I say. ancianita Apr 2014 #29
The second phase of the movement. I think starting with local politics is where it has to begin sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #33
So 'inevitable', you refused to listen last year. randome Apr 2014 #37
Airc, you were the one who was not listening. You demonstrated a complete lack of understanding sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #70
Maybe if you wish really, really hard, the things you say might come true. randome Apr 2014 #82
Lol, I didn't have to wish very hard to get that response, thanks for remaining so sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #93
As I reported early on nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #38
Yes, I remember your reporting on it. In fact I just mentioned it in my response below to someone sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #72
Will most ProSense Apr 2014 #35
Wow. Some hard truths there. randome Apr 2014 #36
most rural Americans are very conservative arely staircase Apr 2014 #49
Depends on where in 'Murka. KamaAina Apr 2014 #53
I said most. not all nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #56
I could totally see that happening in Ecotopia KamaAina Apr 2014 #52
hear, hear. i owned that book roguevalley Apr 2014 #65
Because that's where we should be. DeSwiss Apr 2014 #66
I believe politics follows social movement notundecided Apr 2014 #67
Occupy Bundy hmmm... maggies farm Apr 2014 #73
"ousting corrupt officials" Micah M. White, thank you! Sunlei Apr 2014 #75
Occupy was a FAILURE because they refused to become a viable POLITICAL force. Simple as that. RBInMaine Apr 2014 #77
They refused to ALIGN themselves with corrupt political forces. djean111 Apr 2014 #80
...or attempt to change them. brooklynite Apr 2014 #85
I understand that, but as far as I can see, our current political system and government are djean111 Apr 2014 #88
In that case, if Occupy et al won't, it won't happen at all brooklynite Apr 2014 #89
I doubt Occupy cares about your put-downs. djean111 Apr 2014 #90
I don't care what Occupy thinks at all...because they're irrelevent brooklynite Apr 2014 #91
Wow! You really really dislike them! Can't imagine why - is it because they refused to djean111 Apr 2014 #92
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An Occupy founder says th...»Reply #35