Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,252 posts)
50. It was bloody enough for the police officer to put it in his report but not bloody enough to show
Thu Mar 29, 2012, 01:52 AM
Mar 2012

at all in the video? Not on his face or on his clothes?

Oh yeah, the police got him all cleaned up before they brought him in. Right.

Dream on.

I'm not supporting "the defense of Trayvon." Trayvon doesn't need any defense. All he did was DIE.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/28/trayvon-martin-police-video_n_1386764.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D147477

Newly released video of George Zimmerman at the Sanford Police Department the night he shot Trayvon Martin to death show the neighborhood watch volunteer without blood on his clothing or bruises on his face or head. His clean-shaven picture seems to contrast with the violent beating he told police he endured at the hands of Martin, 17, who Zimmerman said attacked him from behind.

The video, obtained by ABC News, appears inconsistent with Zimmerman’s recently leaked statement to police that he was in a death struggle with Martin before Zimmerman shot him in the chest in self-defense. Zimmerman told investigators that Martin jumped him from behind, punched him in the nose and pounded his head into a sidewalk, according to a police report first described by the Orlando Sentinal.

In the video, apparently taken by surveillance cameras outside and inside the police station, Zimmerman’s face and head are clearly visible and show no injuries consistent with the kind of fight Zimmerman's statement described.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

how stupid TorchTheWitch Mar 2012 #1
to think this can still be spun _|_ got root Mar 2012 #4
so? TorchTheWitch Mar 2012 #8
lol got root Mar 2012 #11
Straws. She's grasping at straws now. nt LaydeeBug Mar 2012 #12
do yourself a favor and look up my posts on this case TorchTheWitch Mar 2012 #21
this 'silly grainy video' will be the last straw in this miscarriage of justice being allowed to got root Mar 2012 #25
yup. Stow it, is what I say. Couldn't agree with you more. nt LaydeeBug Mar 2012 #29
But his defenders are saying that he had a bloody nose, not just a broken nose. pnwmom Mar 2012 #27
so what? TorchTheWitch Mar 2012 #46
It was bloody enough for the police officer to put it in his report but not bloody enough to show pnwmom Mar 2012 #50
No, really, that's ok. My opinion is MINE and I am entitled to it without your creepy aspersions LaydeeBug Mar 2012 #28
so what if he Did have injuries? Whisp Mar 2012 #17
The right kind of injuries could have supported a claim of self defense ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #43
Thank you for posting the video. EVEN A GRAINY video plainly shows the TRUTH LaydeeBug Mar 2012 #10
Yes, it's ridiculous. EFerrari Mar 2012 #13
And I am not sure how grainy this vid is, when I can plainly see the shine on the top of his head.nt LaydeeBug Mar 2012 #14
Is this from that night or emilyg Mar 2012 #37
that night got root Mar 2012 #40
I think you missed the fact... dballance Mar 2012 #39
No, it is flat out HONEST. Sorry the TRUTH bothers you. nt LaydeeBug Mar 2012 #9
Care to explain how he had a bloody nose with no bloodstains? pnwmom Mar 2012 #26
Then where's the blood? jeff47 Mar 2012 #32
There is nothing grainy about this video. Maybe it's your monitor. Number23 Mar 2012 #51
Preach, Laydeebug!! ABSOLUTELY. Ecumenist Mar 2012 #2
It would be good to see what the EMS report says too ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #3
you won't be happy till all the local 'authorities' weigh in on the matter, eh? got root Mar 2012 #6
No, I would like to see the totality of the data ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #15
yeah, it must be nice in that ivory tower you live in got root Mar 2012 #16
OMFG, YOU'RE RIGHT, GET A ROPE!!1! Tejas Mar 2012 #19
and restrain that murderer, hell yeah! got root Mar 2012 #20
what is with the sarcasm? robinlynne Mar 2012 #24
Must be nice to be as prescient as you are ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #42
sorry, professor... but there was a lot of details about this case that made it obvious that there got root Mar 2012 #44
I too thought he should have been arrested that night and have clearly said so ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2012 #47
I would, too. emilyg Mar 2012 #38
the video is damning riverwalker Mar 2012 #5
"hours" is pushing it... alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #7
No, he needs to be charged with obstruction of justice! n/t markpkessinger Mar 2012 #18
I'm sure he DID have blood on him: kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #22
Actually the police filed a report saying they did not believe Zimmerman and . The DA did this. robinlynne Mar 2012 #23
I think you're right. This has always seemed like someone's been protecting him. nt LaydeeBug Mar 2012 #30
One investigator filed an affidavit in favor of charging him. EFerrari Mar 2012 #31
the chief investigator. the head of the investigation. filed an affidavit saying to arrest him, and robinlynne Mar 2012 #33
Yes, and the department spokes-spinner said EFerrari Mar 2012 #35
That is not what I read. I read that the district attorney went there in person to release him. robinlynne Mar 2012 #36
It's possible but there's so much fabrication going on EFerrari Mar 2012 #45
This is weird. I was looking for the article with that police dept statement EFerrari Mar 2012 #49
Interesting DallasNE Mar 2012 #34
No blood anywhere. No observable injuries. And this is not exactly a "grainy" video. Th1onein Mar 2012 #41
Is it possible he changed jackets at home? ArcticFox Mar 2012 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Any police officer who sa...»Reply #50