Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Message auto-removed [View all]

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Interesting piece,
Wed Apr 30, 2014, 10:39 AM
Apr 2014
Today, I cast my vote on the Senate Banking Committee for Stanley Fischer to serve in the No. 2 position at the U.S. Federal Reserve. I asked Fischer tough questions – in person, at his nomination hearing, and in writing – and I have been impressed with the depth of his knowledge and experience.

But I cast my vote reluctantly because of my growing frustration over the concentration of people with ties to the megabank Citigroup in senior government positions...Fischer, after all, is just the latest Citi alumnus to be tapped for a high-level government position. Starting with Robert Rubin – a former Citi CEO – three of the last four Treasury secretaries under Democratic presidents have had Citigroup affiliations before or after their Treasury service. (The fourth was offered, but declined, Citigroup’s CEO position.) Directors of the National Economic Council and Office of Management and Budget, as well as our current U.S. trade representative, also have had strong ties to Citigroup.

No one doubts that there are smart, hard-working people at Citigroup and elsewhere in the financial industry. When I worked to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, I interviewed, hired and worked alongside many people with private-sector experience. Private-sector experience can be valuable and should not disqualify someone from serving in the upper levels of government...The Citigroup clique has produced some effective public servants, but it has crowded out too many others who might have brought a different perspective to their service.

<...>

For too long, the titans of Wall Street succeeded in pushing government policies that made the megabanks rich beyond imagination, while leaving working families to struggle from payday to payday. Many Republicans openly acknowledge their ties to Wall Street, but Democrats have campaigned on an alternative approach focusing on expanding opportunities and leveling the playing field for the middle class. Democrats’ slogans have won some elections, but once in power, Democratic administrations have too often stacked top positions in government with people close to Wall Street. Stanley Fischer is a good man and has earned my respect, but this is a real and growing problem. If the big banks can seize both parties, then the Democrats—and the country—lose the central economic argument that government should work for the people, not just for the rich and powerful.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/04/the-citigroup-clique-106125_full.html

...but it seems more about raising awareness and justifying her vote. Many of these people have ties to the Clinton administration.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Message auto-removed [View all] Name removed Apr 2014 OP
Because the Banksters Own him. His only job is to protect the Banksters from reglation / prosecution Vincardog Apr 2014 #1
"His only job is to protect the Banksters from reglation (sic)/prosecution". blue neen Apr 2014 #17
Please prove me wrong. Name ONE Bankster threatened with jail time. Name one meaningful reform Vincardog Apr 2014 #32
No, you prove me wrong. blue neen Apr 2014 #34
Interesting piece, ProSense Apr 2014 #2
"I interviewed, hired and worked alongside many people with private-sector experience" frazzled Apr 2014 #5
Please cross post this in the Elizabeth Warren Group Autumn Apr 2014 #3
creating a "team of rivals" against Goldman Sux? nt magical thyme Apr 2014 #4
But she's not running for you-know-what! Scuba Apr 2014 #6
I was going to post the same thing. Auntie Bush Apr 2014 #21
She'll make a fantastic President. woolldog Apr 2014 #7
Why didn't she say former academic, IMF, or World Bank employees? frazzled Apr 2014 #8
interesting, thanks. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2014 #19
Another picture of Fischer, from The Guardian frazzled Apr 2014 #23
well then. guess it's pretty clear BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2014 #25
The Guardian vs. Elizabeth Warren?!?! Whatever is an Obama critic to do? Wait - I know!!! stevenleser Apr 2014 #28
Good question MynameisBlarney Apr 2014 #9
110% of liberal Democrats support Citigroup in senior government positions! IDemo Apr 2014 #10
But fox says 113%! Fearless Apr 2014 #12
I should think it is obvious Fearless Apr 2014 #11
But there is no Quid Pro Quo according to Chief Justice Roberts! Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #13
Rhetorical question, Senator Warren? nt Zorra Apr 2014 #14
Yeah, why? BrotherIvan Apr 2014 #15
Obama tossed aside all progressive economic advisors days after taking the oath of office Roland99 Apr 2014 #16
A lot of our fellow DUers would like an honest answer to this question too. chknltl Apr 2014 #18
And we all know the answer to it. zeemike Apr 2014 #20
Because they are well qualified to do the job ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #22
Same reason he supports the TPP, drilling and fracking, indefinite detention, woo me with science Apr 2014 #24
ashamed I was fooled by the lies in 2008 xiamiam Apr 2014 #27
I don't recognize this country anymore. This is the level of corruption woo me with science Apr 2014 #30
Apparently it's a total coincidence gratuitous Apr 2014 #26
yeah, i got that from this thread too. druidity33 Apr 2014 #29
I don't think there is animosity toward Senator Warren here. stevenleser Apr 2014 #31
rec warrprayer Apr 2014 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Message auto-removed»Reply #2