Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Message auto-removed [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Interesting piece,
Today, I cast my vote on the Senate Banking Committee for Stanley Fischer to serve in the No. 2 position at the U.S. Federal Reserve. I asked Fischer tough questions in person, at his nomination hearing, and in writing and I have been impressed with the depth of his knowledge and experience.
But I cast my vote reluctantly because of my growing frustration over the concentration of people with ties to the megabank Citigroup in senior government positions...Fischer, after all, is just the latest Citi alumnus to be tapped for a high-level government position. Starting with Robert Rubin a former Citi CEO three of the last four Treasury secretaries under Democratic presidents have had Citigroup affiliations before or after their Treasury service. (The fourth was offered, but declined, Citigroups CEO position.) Directors of the National Economic Council and Office of Management and Budget, as well as our current U.S. trade representative, also have had strong ties to Citigroup.
No one doubts that there are smart, hard-working people at Citigroup and elsewhere in the financial industry. When I worked to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, I interviewed, hired and worked alongside many people with private-sector experience. Private-sector experience can be valuable and should not disqualify someone from serving in the upper levels of government...The Citigroup clique has produced some effective public servants, but it has crowded out too many others who might have brought a different perspective to their service.
<...>
For too long, the titans of Wall Street succeeded in pushing government policies that made the megabanks rich beyond imagination, while leaving working families to struggle from payday to payday. Many Republicans openly acknowledge their ties to Wall Street, but Democrats have campaigned on an alternative approach focusing on expanding opportunities and leveling the playing field for the middle class. Democrats slogans have won some elections, but once in power, Democratic administrations have too often stacked top positions in government with people close to Wall Street. Stanley Fischer is a good man and has earned my respect, but this is a real and growing problem. If the big banks can seize both parties, then the Democratsand the countrylose the central economic argument that government should work for the people, not just for the rich and powerful.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/04/the-citigroup-clique-106125_full.html
But I cast my vote reluctantly because of my growing frustration over the concentration of people with ties to the megabank Citigroup in senior government positions...Fischer, after all, is just the latest Citi alumnus to be tapped for a high-level government position. Starting with Robert Rubin a former Citi CEO three of the last four Treasury secretaries under Democratic presidents have had Citigroup affiliations before or after their Treasury service. (The fourth was offered, but declined, Citigroups CEO position.) Directors of the National Economic Council and Office of Management and Budget, as well as our current U.S. trade representative, also have had strong ties to Citigroup.
No one doubts that there are smart, hard-working people at Citigroup and elsewhere in the financial industry. When I worked to set up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, I interviewed, hired and worked alongside many people with private-sector experience. Private-sector experience can be valuable and should not disqualify someone from serving in the upper levels of government...The Citigroup clique has produced some effective public servants, but it has crowded out too many others who might have brought a different perspective to their service.
<...>
For too long, the titans of Wall Street succeeded in pushing government policies that made the megabanks rich beyond imagination, while leaving working families to struggle from payday to payday. Many Republicans openly acknowledge their ties to Wall Street, but Democrats have campaigned on an alternative approach focusing on expanding opportunities and leveling the playing field for the middle class. Democrats slogans have won some elections, but once in power, Democratic administrations have too often stacked top positions in government with people close to Wall Street. Stanley Fischer is a good man and has earned my respect, but this is a real and growing problem. If the big banks can seize both parties, then the Democratsand the countrylose the central economic argument that government should work for the people, not just for the rich and powerful.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/04/the-citigroup-clique-106125_full.html
...but it seems more about raising awareness and justifying her vote. Many of these people have ties to the Clinton administration.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because the Banksters Own him. His only job is to protect the Banksters from reglation / prosecution
Vincardog
Apr 2014
#1
Please prove me wrong. Name ONE Bankster threatened with jail time. Name one meaningful reform
Vincardog
Apr 2014
#32
"I interviewed, hired and worked alongside many people with private-sector experience"
frazzled
Apr 2014
#5
The Guardian vs. Elizabeth Warren?!?! Whatever is an Obama critic to do? Wait - I know!!!
stevenleser
Apr 2014
#28
Obama tossed aside all progressive economic advisors days after taking the oath of office
Roland99
Apr 2014
#16
Same reason he supports the TPP, drilling and fracking, indefinite detention,
woo me with science
Apr 2014
#24
I don't recognize this country anymore. This is the level of corruption
woo me with science
Apr 2014
#30