Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)

24. Same reason he supports the TPP, drilling and fracking, indefinite detention,

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Wed Apr 30, 2014, 01:42 PM

Apr 2014

drone wars, private prisons, corporate schools, bank bailouts, austerity for the 99 percent, toll highways, Homeland Security groping, a massive surveillance state targeted at Americans, corporate control of the internet, assaults on journalism, propaganda for Americans, and persecution of whistleblowers...

It's a corporate, Trojan horse presidency, systematically implementing the corporate agenda that is destroying this country and our Constitution and impoverishing millions.

This is why we need you, Elizabeth....or Bernie, or Robert...

We are sold out, lock, stock, and barrel, and we are under malignant assault even by those who claim to represent us.

We desperately need all of you.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Message auto-removed [View all] Name removed Apr 2014 OP

Because the Banksters Own him. His only job is to protect the Banksters from reglation / prosecution Vincardog Apr 2014 #1

"His only job is to protect the Banksters from reglation (sic)/prosecution". blue neen Apr 2014 #17

Please prove me wrong. Name ONE Bankster threatened with jail time. Name one meaningful reform Vincardog Apr 2014 #32

No, you prove me wrong. blue neen Apr 2014 #34

Interesting piece, ProSense Apr 2014 #2

"I interviewed, hired and worked alongside many people with private-sector experience" frazzled Apr 2014 #5

Please cross post this in the Elizabeth Warren Group Autumn Apr 2014 #3

creating a "team of rivals" against Goldman Sux? nt magical thyme Apr 2014 #4

But she's not running for you-know-what! Scuba Apr 2014 #6

I was going to post the same thing. Auntie Bush Apr 2014 #21

She'll make a fantastic President. woolldog Apr 2014 #7

Why didn't she say former academic, IMF, or World Bank employees? frazzled Apr 2014 #8

interesting, thanks. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2014 #19

Another picture of Fischer, from The Guardian frazzled Apr 2014 #23

well then. guess it's pretty clear BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2014 #25

The Guardian vs. Elizabeth Warren?!?! Whatever is an Obama critic to do? Wait - I know!!! stevenleser Apr 2014 #28

Good question MynameisBlarney Apr 2014 #9

110% of liberal Democrats support Citigroup in senior government positions! IDemo Apr 2014 #10

But fox says 113%! Fearless Apr 2014 #12

I should think it is obvious Fearless Apr 2014 #11

But there is no Quid Pro Quo according to Chief Justice Roberts! Dustlawyer Apr 2014 #13

Rhetorical question, Senator Warren? nt Zorra Apr 2014 #14

Yeah, why? BrotherIvan Apr 2014 #15

Obama tossed aside all progressive economic advisors days after taking the oath of office Roland99 Apr 2014 #16

A lot of our fellow DUers would like an honest answer to this question too. chknltl Apr 2014 #18

And we all know the answer to it. zeemike Apr 2014 #20

Because they are well qualified to do the job ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2014 #22

Same reason he supports the TPP, drilling and fracking, indefinite detention, woo me with science Apr 2014 #24

ashamed I was fooled by the lies in 2008 xiamiam Apr 2014 #27

I don't recognize this country anymore. This is the level of corruption woo me with science Apr 2014 #30

Apparently it's a total coincidence gratuitous Apr 2014 #26

yeah, i got that from this thread too. druidity33 Apr 2014 #29

I don't think there is animosity toward Senator Warren here. stevenleser Apr 2014 #31

rec warrprayer Apr 2014 #33