Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Glad to hear it... Mr_Rogers Apr 2014 #1
Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #2
Um...I think the article said the rapist was being re-sentenced. Arkana Apr 2014 #4
Uhm...there was no other link in the OP than the twitter link. BlueCaliDem Apr 2014 #8
Only four? Arkana Apr 2014 #9
Four years as a sex offender - especially having raped a child - is an eternity BlueCaliDem Apr 2014 #11
Well excuse me.... Mr_Rogers Apr 2014 #5
Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #6
Oh fer chrissake Blue... tkmorris Apr 2014 #12
Way to double down on your obvious misunderstanding... Mr_Rogers Apr 2014 #17
Reading that tweet log, many also jumped to the wrong conclusion... yawnmaster Apr 2014 #18
Welcome to DU Mr. Rogers tkmorris Apr 2014 #14
Much appreciated... Mr_Rogers Apr 2014 #22
Let me add my welcome as well. n/t TDale313 Apr 2014 #23
I think you misunderstood what happened. TDale313 Apr 2014 #7
Actually, I didn't. Read my "BEEP-BEEP_BEEP" post in response to the poster above. BlueCaliDem Apr 2014 #10
Look, I don't know what was in that poster's head TDale313 Apr 2014 #13
the OP does not show an edit... ProdigalJunkMail Apr 2014 #15
Edit History: Make7 Apr 2014 #19
From the twitter link Go Vols Apr 2014 #20
Did they decide the sentence was too onerous? (Reading the comments one could get that idea.) 11 Bravo Apr 2014 #3
related...judge should be disciplined yawnmaster Apr 2014 #16
Agreed. TDale313 Apr 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Montana Supreme Court ove...»Reply #23