Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
17. IIRC, farmers are able to buy fuel with a different tax structure, or substantial tax refunds.
Thu May 1, 2014, 01:48 AM
May 2014

This is probably different in every state, however.

In Wisconsin, for example:

Who may receive a refund of motor vehicle fuel tax paid?

Off-Road Usage of Motor Vehicle Fuel [sec. 78.75, Wis. Stats.]

Wisconsin law provides that motor vehicle fuel is not subject to the Wisconsin motor vehicle fuel tax when it is used for off-road purposes in mobile machinery and equipment. Exceptions: It is subject to the motor vehicle fuel tax when placed into licensed motor vehicles used for off-road purposes, snowmobiles, recreational motorboats, and all-terrain vehicles (unless the ATV is registered for private use).

Farmers, construction companies, and logging operations often have off-road usage of motor vehicle fuel in non-licensed mobile machinery and equipment. Waste management, ready-mix, liquid waste (e.g., septic service), and utility companies have licensed vehicles with power take-off (PTO) units that share the same fuel supply tank used to power the vehicle. These companies can receive a refund of the motor vehicle fuel tax paid on fuel placed into the vehicles and used by PTO units. The following percentages have been approved by the department when computing the fuel tax refund attributable to PTO units:
waste management - 30%
ready-mix - 35%
liquid waste companies - 15%
boom and derrick/digger trucks - 15% if 20,000 gross vehicle weight or less
30% if greater than 20,000 GVW

Refund claims must be filed within one year of the date fuel is purchased, and must cover at least 100 gallons. To obtain a refund of the fuel tax paid on motor vehicle fuel used for off-road purposes, file Form MF-001. This form may be filed electronically through My Tax Account or by paper.

http://www.revenue.wi.gov/faqs/ise/mofuel.html


And, Federally:

Introduction

You may be eligible to claim a credit on your income tax return for the federal excise tax on certain fuels. You may also be eligible to claim a quarterly refund of the fuel taxes during the year, instead of waiting to claim a credit on your income tax return.

Whether you can claim a credit or refund depends on whether the fuel was taxed and the purpose (nontaxable use) for which you used the fuel. The nontaxable uses of fuel for which a farmer may claim a credit or refund are generally the following.

Use on a farm for farming purposes.

Off-highway business use.

Uses other than as a fuel in a propulsion engine, such as home use.

Table 14-1 presents an overview of credits and refunds that may be claimed for fuels used for the nontaxable uses listed above. See Publication 510, Excise Taxes, for more information.
Topics - This chapter discusses:

Fuels used in farming

Dyed diesel fuel and dyed kerosene

Fuels used in off-highway business use

Fuels used for household purposes

How to claim a credit or refund

Including the credit or refund in income

http://www.irs.gov/publications/p225/ch14.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"We don't want the rif-raff whose jobs we've shipped abroad to use our commerce ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #1
This would be a terrible, terrible mistake. NYC_SKP May 2014 #2
When did DU become against a carbon tax? Recursion May 2014 #3
Interstate highways were built with federal funds for the good of all people... NYC_SKP May 2014 #5
The Interstates are full of tollbooths in the Northeast; the economy hasn't been damaged Recursion May 2014 #7
because the northeast likes being gouged does not make it ok elsewhere nt msongs May 2014 #8
But the Northeast is tired of paying for red states' bridges Recursion May 2014 #9
LOL! Politicalboi May 2014 #25
Buy local? IronLionZion May 2014 #43
Extra pavement, extra costs for multiple routes, one for the rich, one for the poor. NYC_SKP May 2014 #11
I'm no fan of the super-lanes Recursion May 2014 #20
In all fairness Gore, Dean and Warren can afford to pay the tolls 951-Riverside May 2014 #14
Wow. The "Limousine Liberals" attack, on DU. Recursion May 2014 #18
I'm asking again for you to support your assertion that Gore and Warren and Dean each favor tolls Bluenorthwest May 2014 #47
You're simply denying that a use fee is a carbon tax Recursion May 2014 #48
You do realize that in some states (CA being one of them), Live and Learn May 2014 #29
Another option ProSense May 2014 #10
I don't see a practical difference Recursion May 2014 #12
IIRC, farmers are able to buy fuel with a different tax structure, or substantial tax refunds. NYC_SKP May 2014 #17
I know that in many states 2naSalit May 2014 #19
I think a gas tax would be better. DanTex May 2014 #38
It probably would, I agree with that Recursion May 2014 #39
I can understand the flack it's getting. DanTex May 2014 #41
We should have done it a long time ago, would have accelerated fuel mileage improvements. NYC_SKP May 2014 #13
i don't want driving more expensive, i need to use my car and i don't have a lot of extra dionysus May 2014 #23
Well, that's a fair point, that can be made against any tax Recursion May 2014 #24
"Interstate highways were built with federal funds for the good of all people..." Capt. Obvious May 2014 #44
but tolls are regressive taxes Enrique May 2014 #21
Any carbon tax or VAT is pretty regressive Recursion May 2014 #22
When did DU start confusing highway tolls with carbon taxes? FBaggins May 2014 #34
I don't think that the problem is "DU" in general. lumberjack_jeff May 2014 #37
Goodness sakes yeoman6987 May 2014 #31
We don't need no stinkin' roads! BootinUp May 2014 #4
Or rather, good-bye to the word "Freeway" kentauros May 2014 #6
The gas tax is too low. It hasn't been raised for inflation in over 20 years. n/t taught_me_patience May 2014 #15
We are paying 3.50 a gallon of gas yeoman6987 May 2014 #32
Perhaps if we weren't fighting so many wars on so many continents we could funnel some of that npk May 2014 #16
Oh, heresy! We are supposed to EMBRACE having toll roads! djean111 May 2014 #26
Floridians and Portuguese would be right at home. Hulk May 2014 #27
Floridian on a fixed income here. djean111 May 2014 #28
I understand completely Hulk May 2014 #49
Yep. Thanks for the reply! djean111 May 2014 #50
They DO realize that most food is shipped along interstates, and that companies won't eat that... Shandris May 2014 #30
Say good by to any Senator or Congress man that votes for this idiotic idea oneofthe99 May 2014 #33
It's going to be either this or an increase in the gas tax. n/t ProSense May 2014 #35
Let us raise the gas tax so that the poor whistler162 May 2014 #36
A gas tax is different ,hear me out oneofthe99 May 2014 #52
Am I now in favor of regressive taxation? NCTraveler May 2014 #40
I didn't know I had any to say goodbye to. magical thyme May 2014 #42
When the rethugs WON'T FUND ANYTHING for the people... tosh May 2014 #45
Anything to save corporations and billionaires moondust May 2014 #46
First tolls on the internet, now tolls on the highways? DJ13 May 2014 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You May Have To Say Goodb...»Reply #17