Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
36. related:
Thu May 1, 2014, 08:10 AM
May 2014
Mercedes Schneider looked more closely at the 24 members of the two work groups to determine their past experience as educators, with special attention to whether they had any classroom experience.

Here are a few noteworthy conclusions based on her review of the careers of the writers of the CCSS:


In sum, only 3 of the 15 individuals on the 2009 CCSS math work group held positions as classroom teachers of mathematics. None was a classroom teacher in 2009. None taught elementary or middle school mathematics. Three other members have other classroom teaching experience in biology, English, and social studies. None taught elementary school. None taught special education or was certified in special education or English as a Second Language (ESL).

Only one CCSS math work group member was not affiliated with an education company or nonprofit….

In sum, 5 of the 15 individuals on the CCSS ELA work group have classroom experience teaching English. None was a classroom teacher in 2009. None taught elementary grades, special education, or ESL, and none hold certifications in these areas.


The makeup of the work groups helps to explain why so many people in the field of early childhood education find the CCSS to be developmentally inappropriate. There was literally no one on the writing committee (with one possible exception) with any knowledge of how very young children learn. The same concern applies to those who educate children in the middle-school years or children with disabilities or English language learners. The knowledge of these children and their needs was not represented on the working group


http://dianeravitch.net/2014/04/28/mercedes-schneider-who-are-the-24-people-who-wrote-the-common-core-standards/

That the background of those people lean heavily towards the testing industry, rather than the teaching profession, is telling.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That makes too much sense, Sarah. I agree it would be great and fair. Mnemosyne Apr 2014 #1
It would totally take the President out of the decision making yeoman6987 Apr 2014 #27
I understood this to be more of a local/state solution. nt Mnemosyne Apr 2014 #28
What if only actual public school teachers LWolf Apr 2014 #2
The people that have to pay for should have a place at the table nt hack89 Apr 2014 #3
The people that have to pay for? LWolf Apr 2014 #8
Yes - parents should have a say hack89 Apr 2014 #11
I disagree. LWolf Apr 2014 #24
Do you hold the same thoughts on civilian leadership of the military? Mr_Rogers Apr 2014 #32
You're kind of all over the map there. LWolf May 2014 #35
They aren't exactly a disinterested party though either... Mr_Rogers Apr 2014 #13
welcome to DU. please tell us more! nt alp227 Apr 2014 #21
There's nothing more than that. Mr_Rogers Apr 2014 #22
You're right about that. LWolf Apr 2014 #25
Excellent idea, but I'll accept even public school teachers that went beyond teaching nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #6
To a point. LWolf Apr 2014 #9
"If we're going to accept as leaders those that "go beyond" teaching, I think those leaders.... Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #16
It takes a restructuring of the system. LWolf Apr 2014 #23
I support public schools. But I would attend most ivy league schools in a heart beat... Gravitycollapse Apr 2014 #4
The question was not "do you wish you could've attended a wealthy and expensive school so you too Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #7
Certainly, food for thought. nt UtahLib Apr 2014 #5
So, since President Obama sends his daughters to private school, Nye Bevan Apr 2014 #10
Arne Duncan certainly isn't useful hobbit709 Apr 2014 #12
I agree. Arne Duncan reminds me of that definition of insanity: Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #15
Bingo. HooptieWagon Apr 2014 #26
That's not a really good example, the PRESIDENT of the U.S., who requires huge amounts of security, Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #14
Should 1-percenters such as Elizabeth Warren, Nancy Pelosi and Alan Grayson Nye Bevan Apr 2014 #17
YES! The ones deciding what is best in education should be TEACHERS. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #18
And presumably military policy should be decided by GENERALS, ADMIRALS, COLONELS and BRIGADIERS (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2014 #19
This conversation has become ludicrous and it's over. I've seen your previous posts so I know nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #20
Obama listens more to business leaders such as presidents of testing companies more than he liberal_at_heart Apr 2014 #29
Sounds at first like a good idea ... LeftishBrit Apr 2014 #30
I completely agree. I think public schools should be required of public servants, or they should Sarah Ibarruri May 2014 #40
Seems a bit unfair, as kids don't generally choose their schools. Orsino Apr 2014 #31
So because of a decision by a child's parents (going to a private school), that child will be Jgarrick Apr 2014 #33
You're not wanting to get it, are you? You don't like it, and by golly, you're going to pretend you Sarah Ibarruri May 2014 #39
This would exclude all who went to catholic and other religious schools? FarCenter Apr 2014 #34
ALL who did not attend public school. nt Sarah Ibarruri May 2014 #37
related: LWolf May 2014 #36
Horrific. That's like allowing welders to perform open heart surgery on Cheney nt Sarah Ibarruri May 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What if those making educ...»Reply #36