Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Unemployment, housing, ACA, new jobs showing good numbers: BENGHAZI!!!!!!! [View all]Romulox
(25,960 posts)33. Right, but you doubled down on it with the silly list thing. Absolutely ridiculous stuff! nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Unemployment, housing, ACA, new jobs showing good numbers: BENGHAZI!!!!!!! [View all]
kelliekat44
May 2014
OP
In 8 yrs of W, 8 yrs of Raygun, there were HUNDREDS of crimes and real scandals
randys1
May 2014
#13
Housing and employment aren't too good guys...800,000 less people employed, home sales under $250k
Romulox
May 2014
#3
Pick a base year....say 2010...then compare then numbers. Everything is relative..nt
kelliekat44
May 2014
#4
OK. "In the long run, we're all dead." But right now, May 2, 2014, numbers cited aren't too good.
Romulox
May 2014
#5
If The Shoe Were On The Other Foot And The Repubs Would Have These Numbers.....
global1
May 2014
#12
You're right, but that person will continue to spout anti-Obama spin no matter what you say.
stevenleser
May 2014
#9
So the thing you don't remember *just happens* to be right in line with your present POV? Odd!
Romulox
May 2014
#24
Why are you on the list of folks who answered a certain way? You mean besides that you did?
stevenleser
May 2014
#27
I couldn't give a toss about your lists. That's what I was trying to highlight.
Romulox
May 2014
#28
Right, but you doubled down on it with the silly list thing. Absolutely ridiculous stuff! nt
Romulox
May 2014
#33
I do often get asked. And I am glad I have someone to mention. But your #24 is the first mention of
stevenleser
May 2014
#40
Right, so you'll mention my name, which is stored in something *other* than a list...
Romulox
May 2014
#41
I've never made such a claim and you can't provide any link to such a claim. It's ludicrous. nt
Romulox
May 2014
#54
It says, "you told me that I was prejudiced against the rich." That was your accusation.
Romulox
May 2014
#57
So yes, *besides* my #16, since it obviously says no such thing. Defaming someone when the post is
Romulox
May 2014
#59
BTW, I didn't answer your weirdo question any way. That's your bizarre fabrication.
Romulox
May 2014
#30
You're the one who said you did. I am not the one who brought it up or even remembered it. nt
stevenleser
May 2014
#32
You *just said* you had a list to that effect. This is why you memory isn't to be trusted. nt
Romulox
May 2014
#35
No, I didn't. I was simply using your words to answer your question. You brought up "a list" and
stevenleser
May 2014
#36
*You* said it. Then you agreed with and said you'd make further note of it to inform
Romulox
May 2014
#38
Your comment #23 ominously remarks, "But reminding me of that is useful, because I often get asked"
Romulox
May 2014
#42
At last we are on the same page. That is correct. Then you mentioned "a list". nt
stevenleser
May 2014
#43
That's was my recollection of another time you called me names, Steve. Me recalling it doesn't
Romulox
May 2014
#49
Now you are moving the goalposts that you yourself erected. It wont work. nt
stevenleser
May 2014
#51
Can the "I know you ares..." and back up your ridiculous accusation upthread, ok? nt
Romulox
May 2014
#56
For those interested in the truth and not pushing right wing talking points. The labor participation
okaawhatever
May 2014
#15
Rightwing talking points my ass. REALITY is supposed to have a leftwing bias, remember?
Romulox
May 2014
#17
No, I didn't spin them. I told the truth. You claimed that the drop in the workforce
okaawhatever
May 2014
#19
Lower labor participation rates bode ill for economic growth and consumer spending. The housing #s
Romulox
May 2014
#20
I got the press conference confused with another thread. The housing numbers have nothing to do
okaawhatever
May 2014
#21
The lack of availability of homes has to do with the Fed's monetary policy, which makes it cheaper
Romulox
May 2014
#22
Largest pluarlity of the workforce currently is Gen X (just 46 million members vs 82m for boomers)
Dawson Leery
May 2014
#58