Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Everyone is under surveillance now, says whistleblower Edward Snowden [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)42. Speaking of "personal attacks" all you seem to be doing is telling me what you think I think and
believe...we might as well just let you just tell everyone what their views are, since you've already made up your mind!
You're not interested in facts--you are interested in making accusations. Sorry, I don't regard you as The Way or The Light. And why are you talking about Manning when the thread is about Snowden? You do that alot. But, since you insist on rehashing that drama:
==Chelsea Manning stole documents wholesale as a military enlisted member and gave them to Julian Assange, and got an appropriate punishment. Too bad if that troubles you--even Manning admitted culpability.
==Manning is being held in very comfortable digs; no torture, no abuse, because it's Leavenworth and they're quite specific as to how they run things there--it's a calm environment with no drama, the inmates are military so they understand unit discipline, visitors can come every day (unlike civilian prisons), there's tv, cards, exercise, and school. The color scheme may be dreary, but the environment is VERY safe. It's like bootcamp with WAY more perks and less exercise, only it lasts much, much longer and everyone has their own room.
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. Manning knew that stealing those documents and giving them to Assange was wrong, and said as much.
Why can Manning understand that, and you cannot?
A photo of a typical cell in the Leavenworth barracks shows a well-lit but austere space, with a bunk and a desk and a metal toilet-and-sink unit. On her blog, Finch's co-author described beginning his incarceration in a 6-by-9-foot cell with cinderblock walls and a green steel door.
"It is dreary," Gorecki-Robbins said.
Inmates have access to playing cards, board games and television. The prison has craft and music rooms, and recreational activities, including weightlifting and playing basketball, flag football and ping pong. Both Finch and Gorecki-Robbins said seating for television or movies shown by the prison is determined by an inmate's social status, with the inmate with the highest ranking sitting front and center and newcomers taking seats in the back.
Uniforms are brown, usually worn and "heavily starched," Finch said. Inmates can buy their own shoes, she said, and that's where their fashion individuality shows.
Inmates are paid just pennies an hour for their work, Finch said. People outside the prison can send them money orders, though they're limited to spending $80 a month, she said.
Visitors can come any day of the week, according to post officials, though hours on weekdays are limited to the evenings. There are no conjugal visits.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/21/fort-leavenworth-prison_n_3790965.html
"It is dreary," Gorecki-Robbins said.
Inmates have access to playing cards, board games and television. The prison has craft and music rooms, and recreational activities, including weightlifting and playing basketball, flag football and ping pong. Both Finch and Gorecki-Robbins said seating for television or movies shown by the prison is determined by an inmate's social status, with the inmate with the highest ranking sitting front and center and newcomers taking seats in the back.
Uniforms are brown, usually worn and "heavily starched," Finch said. Inmates can buy their own shoes, she said, and that's where their fashion individuality shows.
Inmates are paid just pennies an hour for their work, Finch said. People outside the prison can send them money orders, though they're limited to spending $80 a month, she said.
Visitors can come any day of the week, according to post officials, though hours on weekdays are limited to the evenings. There are no conjugal visits.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/21/fort-leavenworth-prison_n_3790965.html
This thread isn't about Manning, though---but you sure like to change the subject!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
181 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Everyone is under surveillance now, says whistleblower Edward Snowden [View all]
Jesus Malverde
May 2014
OP
I'm guessing the rationalization du jour will be a combination of A and B
Jesus Malverde
May 2014
#3
One day even the white knights with nothing to hide will come around to say no to the STAZI
Jesus Malverde
May 2014
#5
Yep, perhaps they just don't understand the technology employed. It is dangerous to
RKP5637
May 2014
#126
I've been saying every one was under surveillance for the last 40 years. The methods are
kelliekat44
May 2014
#136
And 'National Security' remains the lie to create the fear that creates support for throwing
sabrina 1
May 2014
#10
Lol! So it's okay for the US to do what Russia does now? I'm confused, I thought we didn't act
sabrina 1
May 2014
#12
Whistle Blower Edward Snowden faces the same persecution all Whistle Blowers are subjected
sabrina 1
May 2014
#19
Got anything to refute anything I said? Personal attacks have zero effect on me, I got used to them
sabrina 1
May 2014
#33
Speaking of "personal attacks" all you seem to be doing is telling me what you think I think and
MADem
May 2014
#42
This thread is about a Whistle Blower. Manning too was a Whistle Blower. YOU implied falsely that US
sabrina 1
May 2014
#45
Manning was not a whistle blower, those stolen documents were not read or vetted but given wholesale
MADem
May 2014
#46
Don't try to "guess" what you think people mean--you don't do a very good or accurate job at it.
MADem
May 2014
#61
I've been very clear. I'm not going to play a hypothetical game with dead children,
MADem
May 2014
#63
Oh, fachrissake. What part of Immunity From Prosecution are you having difficulty
MADem
May 2014
#119
Look, he could have gotten immunity without leaving, BEFORE Obama said anything.
MADem
May 2014
#179
Yes. I vaguely recall that when the Patriot Act was being drafted, there was quite a discussion
JDPriestly
May 2014
#108
No, I heard the wind up and the pitch of a tee ball coach, easing the ball over the plate
MADem
May 2014
#110
As I listend, Putin was quite taken aback. He even said something about not understanding the
JDPriestly
May 2014
#111
No he wasn't. Good grief. That pitch was right over the plate and Pootie hit it outta the park.
MADem
May 2014
#118
If any of the Proud Putin Puffer-Uppers would take the time to read those links, their heads would
MADem
May 2014
#25
Why, we don't live in Russia, we live HERE where we KNOW our government agencies are spying on
sabrina 1
May 2014
#29
Not sure where you drew the conclusion that I'm "more concerned about OTHER countries"
MADem
May 2014
#32
We know that Russia spies on its citizens. That is not new. Russia does not pride itself on its
JDPriestly
May 2014
#53
Now that post would make a superb thesis to start a thread... you hit the nail squarely on the head!
MADem
May 2014
#40
Correct me if I am wrong, but Obama doesn't even mention the NSA in that speech.
Vattel
May 2014
#125
I apologize for being unclear. What I should said is that Obama didn't mention the NSA by name.
Vattel
May 2014
#140
NSA isn't "law enforcement" like the United States Marine Corps isn't "law enforcement."
MADem
May 2014
#149
In everything you quoted, there is no mention of a national discussion on NSA surveillance.
Vattel
May 2014
#150
No, I don't agree with you because you keep moving the goalposts all over the field.
MADem
May 2014
#173
I don't agree with that. The "discussion" or "conversation" was already happening.
MADem
May 2014
#180
So you don't agree with me that Obama wasn't talking about the necessity of a national discussion
Vattel
May 2014
#181
The post you quoted is a demand for greater transparency, not the proving of a negative. /nt
Marr
May 2014
#100
That is the point. The specifics of these programs need to be more widely disclosed.
Marr
May 2014
#124
If you disagree that more transparency is needed, you disagree with Obama's public position.
Marr
May 2014
#139
If they use a phone, Verizon et al are 'collecting and storing their data'. So unless people
sabrina 1
May 2014
#15
Those are some radical ideas. Are you sure they didn't come from RT or Al Jazeera?
sabrina 1
May 2014
#31
must be our banks and our phone services who share our phone bill and our bank statements with
Sunlei
May 2014
#72
"But then he hypes it up into tall tales like this that his leaks don't support."
Maedhros
May 2014
#154
I don't think he needs to address all surveillance. That is not where he was working.
djean111
May 2014
#178