Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
48. You're welcome.
Sun May 4, 2014, 06:53 AM
May 2014

It's funny because I am usually the one being accused of being the wet blanket.

I do have hope and I do think we can impact our destinies. But, not by using the means most want to use, like signing internet petitions or calling Congress or their state houses. That doesn't harm, unless one assumes that, by so doing, they've "made their voice heard" to anyone who gives a rat's pellet and need not think or do further.

When I say that, everyone "hears" it as giving up, but I am really saying we have to do other things, foremost being getting more creative in our thinking. Organizing and participating in mass boycotts, is one example of a perfectly legal tactic. So are demonstrations that are bigger, more persistent, and better planned and publicized than we've been managing of late. (TOS require me not to urge acts that are not perfectly legal, so I won't, bu thinking more creatively about cause that we create and effect on the PTB is key.)

I also think a fairer system in terms of more than two parties having a realistic chance of winning is key to making people vote. Getting rid of the filibuster would help, too and more accountability to the public in general. I think people have little interest in toggling back and forth between Democrat and Republican, only to have both of them blame the other and/or the Supreme Court for everything.


The answer(s) is out there. We just don't, as a rule, look really hard or long or collectively. They have think tanks. We don't.

Now, I'll stop because when I make a post like this, the first poster who replies to me gets banned. It's happened at least three times that I know of.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not "Bonzo?" johnp3907 May 2014 #1
He was a chimp of the old blockhead. kairos12 May 2014 #29
! johnp3907 May 2014 #40
Hmmm ... sounds like Ms. Thatcher may have served as "Reagan's brain" ... eppur_se_muova May 2014 #2
And, to combine posts #2 and #3 ... muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #20
Reagan and W are the Bozo bookends of the "conservative" era eShirl May 2014 #3
Doesn't that assume that the conservative era will end when in 2016. merrily May 2014 #12
Yeah ... Cosmocat May 2014 #31
I've seen glimmers. merrily May 2014 #32
That is it Cosmocat May 2014 #42
.... merrily May 2014 #43
Yeah Cosmocat May 2014 #44
You're welcome. merrily May 2014 #48
Reagan was a bozo. HooptieWagon May 2014 #4
W had Rove. merrily May 2014 #13
He wasn't a Bozo, he was an actor suffering from dementia and alzheimers who was used as a puppet NightWatcher May 2014 #5
+1,000 Thirties Child May 2014 #7
1 otherone May 2014 #11
He was unable to sustain a serious conversation about ANYTHING. progressoid May 2014 #6
Yet, he lives on in the video of the campaign in which he blows merrily May 2014 #33
Yeah, that's how a lot of us saw him. Scuba May 2014 #8
^^THIS^^ Auggie May 2014 #27
And we still do. calimary May 2014 #38
Not far off shenmue May 2014 #9
We did for a while Prophet 451 May 2014 #17
Unfortunately, we didn't get it right either. You elected Ronnie, but we elected Maggie. LeftishBrit May 2014 #50
Doesn't exactly cast Thatcher in a good light given that the two of them were Skidmore May 2014 #10
Why? Her job was to do what she thought best for her country, not to be a true friend to Reagan. merrily May 2014 #14
Then Bush came along and made him look like a genius. 6000eliot May 2014 #15
Meh. In secret, they probably portray quite a few people as bozos, especially USians. merrily May 2014 #16
Shocked! I'm shocked...well, actually, no. genwah May 2014 #18
Spitting Image- The full presidents brain is missing Ep.1 PumpkinAle May 2014 #19
"sheer incredulity that this man could occupy the White House" - yeah, I felt that, from the minute kath May 2014 #21
Many of us already knew this back then ... DrBulldog May 2014 #22
Imagine their opinion of McChimp. Hoppy May 2014 #23
Son of Bozo *and* Bonzo ? nt eppur_se_muova May 2014 #25
That's "PRESIDENT Bozo" to you, Engländer! KansDem May 2014 #24
Hier spricht die Stimme der Energie... Octafish May 2014 #45
New voters were born during Clinton and grew up under Dubya.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2014 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #41
Truth hurts get the red out May 2014 #28
Gorbachev "We just saw him as an actor reading his lines" underpants May 2014 #30
So true. Glad somebody saw that the emperor had no clothes... NC_Nurse May 2014 #34
So he was! LeftishBrit May 2014 #35
Ya,...so,..the Brits had it right. Segami May 2014 #36
Reagan was a bozo Gothmog May 2014 #37
Manipulable doofuses are the best kinds of friends, right Maggie? n/t lumberjack_jeff May 2014 #39
Bozo for White Power and Dark Forces Octafish May 2014 #46
Reagan portrayed Reagan as a Bozo Shankapotomus May 2014 #47
Bingo. TroglodyteScholar May 2014 #52
Is this part of the Snowden revelations? nt kelliekat44 May 2014 #49
Portrayed? Sanity Claws May 2014 #51
Accurately so. greatauntoftriplets May 2014 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»British Officials Portray...»Reply #48