Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This thing with Cliven Bundy is not going to end well. [View all]Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)92. "essentially a homeless camp"
Some of these guys who showed up didn't think to bring a change of underwear.
Which is funny considering they would need it if the shooting actually started.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He needs to crawl back in the rat hole he escaped. He still owes the grazing fees.
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#1
Some people have to be slapped to the ground before they get a grasp of what assholes they are. In
RKP5637
May 2014
#3
I know that part of the country and its rather remote from necessities especially gas
Cleita
May 2014
#9
What property? The property for which Bundy is in arrears for grazing fees?
KittyWampus
May 2014
#38
What about that video of one of the mooch militia blocking a TV news crew and responding,
tblue37
May 2014
#52
You make a very good point, as usual! Confrontation might well galvanize them and casual
RKP5637
May 2014
#42
My observation over the years in the US is often the assholes and wackos get a free pass, but
RKP5637
May 2014
#59
Yeah, because military weapons technology hasn't progressed since the 1780's.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#97
See, the whole 'frozen accounts' thing or auctions and whatnot? Seems perfectly fine.
Shandris
May 2014
#126
There are court orders for Bundy to pay for use of the federal lands,
No Vested Interest
May 2014
#18
so, you're in the club where people with guns can flaunt Federal Law blatantly over many years?
KittyWampus
May 2014
#39
Occupy for the most part placed itself in areas that are, under our First Amendment,
JDPriestly
May 2014
#94
It has nothing to do with finances except that the federal government has a right to claim
JDPriestly
May 2014
#116
But Bundy is still allowing his cattle to feed on federal land without a permit.
JDPriestly
May 2014
#115
I remember seeing several posts about these checkpoints, but last time I knew of...
Shandris
May 2014
#101
While I agree that a majority of RW talk is bullshit, only an idealogue thinks they know...
Shandris
May 2014
#102
The evolutionists are right. And those that believe the planet is about 4.3 billion years old.....
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#114
LOL. Well duh! But I wouldn't call that a political belief; there are RW'ers who believe in...
Shandris
May 2014
#117
There's conflicting narratives of everything when there's Faux News and Limbaugh around.
cui bono
May 2014
#134
They can't spot a high flying drone, and they sure as hell won't spot one at night.
MADem
May 2014
#13
If someone wants to do meth and young girls there are a million other better places to do it.
former9thward
May 2014
#31
if these racist scum perceive what they're doing as "right" that is absolutely their problem
KittyWampus
May 2014
#41
No, this is the perfect place for the deranged nazi pedo-meth militia types. They love remote areas
951-Riverside
May 2014
#137
It is very remote if you actually look at the map and they "kicked" the media out long ago
951-Riverside
May 2014
#152
They are the real "moochers" the GOP talks about. Stop all Fed benefit checks. See how that goes.
kelliekat44
May 2014
#26
did Occupy have guns aimed at other people? Was Occupy out in the middle of desert?
KittyWampus
May 2014
#43
I brought Occupy into the conversation because the same media points were made then.
former9thward
May 2014
#68
You can have an opinion but you cannot change facts. When you try and someone calls you on it you
jwirr
May 2014
#65
I was there in the 60s also and yes we were peacefully protesting like Occupy did. That is not what
jwirr
May 2014
#71
Those incidents were mainly at the end of the moverment. As to the early violence especially
jwirr
May 2014
#75
Yeah, but all those assault rifles, pistols, ammo and camouflage cost shitloads of money.
Paladin
May 2014
#46
To the contrary: I honestly want you to engage in as much discussion as you want. (nt)
Paladin
May 2014
#76
Yes, but OWS didn't call people on welfare losers while being on welfare themselves.
chrisa
May 2014
#149
The Occupy folks didn't spend their lives banging on about "freeloaders" and "takers".
Arkana
May 2014
#151
Need to leak aerial shots of them standing around out there to totally freak them out....
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2014
#16
that is actually a good idea. Psychological warfare. Maybe they'd start shooting themselves
KittyWampus
May 2014
#48
And the half-erased word "informant" with a vaguely directed arrow ... nt
eppur_se_muova
May 2014
#62
Remote control planes flying over the check points would probably re-enforce the rumors.
Gore1FL
May 2014
#91
Cut the network feeds, leave the area, keep Bundy off of FOX and this incident
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#107
Give me two head of cattle, four melons and three kids--and make sure the kids are fresh this time
pinboy3niner
May 2014
#135