Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did Snowden offer proof that he could see every purchase crossing his computer screen? [View all]randome
(34,845 posts)27. How is it possible? How would he know? What safety measures were circumvented?
After the LoveInt matter, NSA employees were disciplined and/or fired. Is Snowden saying that no additional safeguards were put into place after that? How would he know?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]If you don't give yourself the same benefit of a doubt you'd give anyone else, you're cheating someone.[/center][/font][hr]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did Snowden offer proof that he could see every purchase crossing his computer screen? [View all]
Cali_Democrat
May 2014
OP
We don't know the extent of the raw data gathered. But the interface XKEYSCORE we have some info
Paulie
May 2014
#1
But that can be seen only with a warrant if you're an American. Something that was made very clear
okaawhatever
May 2014
#20
There is no such thing as a 'group warrant'. For a warrant to be legitimate, it has to show
sabrina 1
May 2014
#53
There are two different warrants. One is to collect the info from the phone co. and store the info.
okaawhatever
May 2014
#56
I'm seeing the 4th amendment. I see that it pluralizes 'persons' please show proof of your
stevenleser
May 2014
#83
What's more, Smith v. Maryland specifies that info provided to 3rd parties is fair game
stevenleser
May 2014
#85
You just posted it, proof that there is no such thing as a SECRET Court issuing a warrant on the
sabrina 1
May 2014
#90
You just posted, and I take it you WERE serious, that the American people have no individual
sabrina 1
May 2014
#94
It never occurred to me for a minute that he meant he could see everyone's purchases
djean111
May 2014
#13
Well then its no big deal.. most of us knew that already, even us "low info types".
DCBob
May 2014
#15
If most of us already knew that already, why demand proof? Pick a stance - either refuse to believe
djean111
May 2014
#18
Those who assumed he could see all of our purchases flashing by on a real time basis merely did not
djean111
May 2014
#21
Wow, to think Snowden has access to all of this information makes me think he is one
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#6
Having worked in data processing all my life, I don't need those explanations.
djean111
May 2014
#14
Except that they need a warrant to see it if you're an American citizen. nt
okaawhatever
May 2014
#22
If NSA employees were spying on their girlfriends or whatever - then I think the warrant thing is
djean111
May 2014
#24
If Snowden's true interest were in wanting people to know the truth he'd say they need a warrant to
okaawhatever
May 2014
#33
You have no idea if he warehoused a thing. None of us knows his responsibilities. He won't even say.
randome
May 2014
#30
He is not saying that he personally does all the data gathering and warehousing.
djean111
May 2014
#36
Yeah, but the NSA not responding to every single one of Snowden's pressers means little.
randome
May 2014
#41
The people who hate him are not concerned about (or cognizant of) the technical stuff.
djean111
May 2014
#92
right.. it's not about snowden except he makes it about himself and his ratfucking.
Cha
May 2014
#52
His sentence should read "If I had a warrant, I could see it at my desk, crossing my screen." nt
okaawhatever
May 2014
#34
Snowden is lying lots also so if Clapper's amswer did fit the taste of many
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#37
I've yet to read denials of most conspiracy theories concerning the NSA and CIA.
stevenleser
May 2014
#81
It doesn't make Snowden look bad - it makes the contortionists look silly. At best.
djean111
May 2014
#91
Yes, I was just told "it's not about snowden".. but, unfortnately snowden makes it about himself and
Cha
May 2014
#55
In the event of a tie, the win goes to the guy we elected, not to a thief on the run.
randome
May 2014
#73
I didn't help to elect Dick Cheney or James Clapper, but you go ahead and make common cause.
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2014
#89