Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
41. And what was the PC for calling the k-9 unit and detaining the person until then? (A search, btw.)
Sun May 4, 2014, 11:42 PM
May 2014

What, you think that RS for a stop is the same as PC for a search?!?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Typical BlindTiresias May 2014 #1
No reason drivers should be exempt from "stop and frisk." Downwinder May 2014 #2
it should apply to no one. n/t 2pooped2pop May 2014 #12
^^^ This^^^ truebrit71 May 2014 #15
Yeah, well that's the way they do it in Russia.. so ya know. we're down with that. 2banon May 2014 #46
I have been told by local law enforcement that, Downwinder May 2014 #47
I can believe that.. 2banon May 2014 #48
I draw the line at random colonoscopy Fairgo May 2014 #3
They actually have random colonoscopies in New Mexico Nevernose May 2014 #30
What the HELL? woo me with science May 2014 #4
As a retired truck driver, I've known this for years. B Calm May 2014 #5
"Reasonable suspicion" is an oxymoron. Scuba May 2014 #6
The first thing I did was look to see if this was "The Onion." Brigid May 2014 #7
That's a trifle hyperbolic to say 'off you go to jail'. randome May 2014 #8
Publisher of the National Trial Lawyer Association or randome? Ichingcarpenter May 2014 #9
It's nice of the HuffPo alarmists to leave out this key section of the ruling: JJChambers May 2014 #10
Reasonable Suspicion to stop, yes. The search? Not so much. X_Digger May 2014 #11
you don't have to actually violate any laws 2pooped2pop May 2014 #14
A drug dog alert is PC to search JJChambers May 2014 #20
The ends justifies the means, eh? X_Digger May 2014 #21
She was trafficking marijuana; apparently their reasonable suspicion was reasonable JJChambers May 2014 #22
Which isn't an answer to my question. What was the RS for the drug dog? X_Digger May 2014 #23
I read it prior to this forum discussion; seems reasonable to me, and to the court, too. JJChambers May 2014 #24
So to confirm: You're cool with acne + nervous driver + tinted windows + two cell phones being RS? X_Digger May 2014 #26
I think you're confused JJChambers May 2014 #38
We're not talking about the stop, we're talking about the search. *sigh* See post 11. X_Digger May 2014 #39
I think you're even more confused JJChambers May 2014 #40
And what was the PC for calling the k-9 unit and detaining the person until then? (A search, btw.) X_Digger May 2014 #41
You should quit before you dig yourself deeper into your hole JJChambers May 2014 #42
Detaining a motorist to wait for a dog is a search, absent specific RS. X_Digger May 2014 #45
*tap* *tap* *tap* Is this thing on? X_Digger May 2014 #34
You omit this: Vattel May 2014 #13
It adds to reasonable suspicion; I thought the search was the result of a drug dog alert ? JJChambers May 2014 #19
Yes, but the use of the dog was itself a search. Vattel May 2014 #29
Actually running a dog around the exterior isn't a search and if the dog alerts JJChambers May 2014 #35
Nope. It depends on the circumstances. Vattel May 2014 #36
A sniff still isn't a search, it's a sniff JJChambers May 2014 #43
A sniff has been ruled by SCOTUS to be a search Vattel May 2014 #44
Almost every car on the road in Ohio is going 10 miles over the speed limit Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #31
The drug dog alert justified the search, not the speeding JJChambers May 2014 #32
Might as well just view cops as the enemy. Lizzie Poppet May 2014 #16
Nope...we're not a police state davidn3600 May 2014 #17
Remember when judges thought the Constitution was more than a piece of paper? Octafish May 2014 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #25
What the fuck? onecaliberal May 2014 #27
They hate us for our WUT? Blue Owl May 2014 #28
Thought crime ... aggiesal May 2014 #33
It just gets worse and worse... ileus May 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Court: The Police...»Reply #41