Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did Snowden offer proof that he could see every purchase crossing his computer screen? [View all]ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)49. If that's what you believe, why argue and worry about it?
All is well....our government would never do anything shady. It would never lie to us. Obviously, Snowden just wants attention and made it all up for personal gain. Nope, no spying going on here...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did Snowden offer proof that he could see every purchase crossing his computer screen? [View all]
Cali_Democrat
May 2014
OP
We don't know the extent of the raw data gathered. But the interface XKEYSCORE we have some info
Paulie
May 2014
#1
But that can be seen only with a warrant if you're an American. Something that was made very clear
okaawhatever
May 2014
#20
There is no such thing as a 'group warrant'. For a warrant to be legitimate, it has to show
sabrina 1
May 2014
#53
There are two different warrants. One is to collect the info from the phone co. and store the info.
okaawhatever
May 2014
#56
I'm seeing the 4th amendment. I see that it pluralizes 'persons' please show proof of your
stevenleser
May 2014
#83
What's more, Smith v. Maryland specifies that info provided to 3rd parties is fair game
stevenleser
May 2014
#85
You just posted it, proof that there is no such thing as a SECRET Court issuing a warrant on the
sabrina 1
May 2014
#90
You just posted, and I take it you WERE serious, that the American people have no individual
sabrina 1
May 2014
#94
It never occurred to me for a minute that he meant he could see everyone's purchases
djean111
May 2014
#13
Well then its no big deal.. most of us knew that already, even us "low info types".
DCBob
May 2014
#15
If most of us already knew that already, why demand proof? Pick a stance - either refuse to believe
djean111
May 2014
#18
Those who assumed he could see all of our purchases flashing by on a real time basis merely did not
djean111
May 2014
#21
Wow, to think Snowden has access to all of this information makes me think he is one
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#6
Having worked in data processing all my life, I don't need those explanations.
djean111
May 2014
#14
Except that they need a warrant to see it if you're an American citizen. nt
okaawhatever
May 2014
#22
If NSA employees were spying on their girlfriends or whatever - then I think the warrant thing is
djean111
May 2014
#24
If Snowden's true interest were in wanting people to know the truth he'd say they need a warrant to
okaawhatever
May 2014
#33
You have no idea if he warehoused a thing. None of us knows his responsibilities. He won't even say.
randome
May 2014
#30
He is not saying that he personally does all the data gathering and warehousing.
djean111
May 2014
#36
Yeah, but the NSA not responding to every single one of Snowden's pressers means little.
randome
May 2014
#41
The people who hate him are not concerned about (or cognizant of) the technical stuff.
djean111
May 2014
#92
right.. it's not about snowden except he makes it about himself and his ratfucking.
Cha
May 2014
#52
His sentence should read "If I had a warrant, I could see it at my desk, crossing my screen." nt
okaawhatever
May 2014
#34
Snowden is lying lots also so if Clapper's amswer did fit the taste of many
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#37
I've yet to read denials of most conspiracy theories concerning the NSA and CIA.
stevenleser
May 2014
#81
It doesn't make Snowden look bad - it makes the contortionists look silly. At best.
djean111
May 2014
#91
Yes, I was just told "it's not about snowden".. but, unfortnately snowden makes it about himself and
Cha
May 2014
#55
In the event of a tie, the win goes to the guy we elected, not to a thief on the run.
randome
May 2014
#73
I didn't help to elect Dick Cheney or James Clapper, but you go ahead and make common cause.
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2014
#89