Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No Russians among Slavyansk self-defense forces - NYT reporters [View all]Recursion
(56,582 posts)7. Yes, the article that literally said they had Army weapons
Just seems weird to suggest that argues against bankrolling, rather than for.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No Russians among Slavyansk self-defense forces - NYT reporters [View all]
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
OP
Bbbut..... So is the media starting to wake up, or are they realizing they can't
newthinking
May 2014
#2
Either way, it's nice to finally see some real journalism coming from the NYT
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#3
Got it. Real journalism = shit you agree with. Propoganda = shit you disagree with.
11 Bravo
May 2014
#40
Real journalism = going to the place where things are happening and talking to the people involved.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#42
Most of those weapons were not paid for. They took them from police buildings.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#9
Maybe they didn't want to publish something they have no evidence for, being that the public
sabrina 1
May 2014
#26
The entire f#ckin articles a lie. The NYT reporters never said there weren't any Russians in
okaawhatever
May 2014
#37
Well, there are no supporters of Russian Interference here and from interviews in the world wide
sabrina 1
May 2014
#29
Ukraine doesn't want to hold the elections that Ukraine itself had scheduled?
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#30
When was there an election? There was coup and a president was installed by a small fraction of
sabrina 1
May 2014
#34
All of the individuals in the Ukrainian government were elected members of Parliament.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#35
Let them hold a real election of all those in the 'interim' govt. That is the ONLY way
sabrina 1
May 2014
#41
It's not the truth. If you'd bother to read the NYT article, you'd realize they never said there
okaawhatever
May 2014
#38
Nothing in that RT article is false, so I don't see the spin you're referring to.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#13
You do know that presidential elections are scheduled this month, right?
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#14
I'm sorry, when was there an election held? When did the people vote for the current regime?
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#16
The interim president and prime minister were not elected by the people.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#20
If Right Sector thugs are still attacking and intimidating people, yes.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#27
Right Sector spearheaded the coup. They are a major element in the goings-on in Ukraine.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#36
You can choose to ignore the neo-Nazis in the interim government all you want.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#44
There was no election in Ukraine. And now nearly half the country does not accept the
sabrina 1
May 2014
#32
The person you responded to is new here. Look at their recs and their posts and tell me if you think
okaawhatever
May 2014
#39
"...does not preclude Russian military intermingling and supplying these groups."
Comrade Grumpy
May 2014
#15
What's false in that article? We know we are supposed to be exposed to the 'Al Jazeera' treatment
sabrina 1
May 2014
#31
GrahamWP_UK suggested that pro-unity protesters should have expected to be attacked by pro-russians
penultimate
May 2014
#47
RT has several war correspondents on the ground in Ukraine. Not just one. You might not want to
sabrina 1
May 2014
#50
Nothing that RT has put forward has indicated it is an objective news source.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#55
Uncritical use of the phrase "self-defense forces" makes me question the neutrality and reliability.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2014
#19
And an hour after shooting that video, Simon Ostrovsky was seized and kept in a basement for 4 days
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#56