Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No Russians among Slavyansk self-defense forces - NYT reporters [View all]Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)11. Same with those who support Russian intererence
It is ugly and both sides are fighting by proxy
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No Russians among Slavyansk self-defense forces - NYT reporters [View all]
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
OP
Bbbut..... So is the media starting to wake up, or are they realizing they can't
newthinking
May 2014
#2
Either way, it's nice to finally see some real journalism coming from the NYT
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#3
Got it. Real journalism = shit you agree with. Propoganda = shit you disagree with.
11 Bravo
May 2014
#40
Real journalism = going to the place where things are happening and talking to the people involved.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#42
Most of those weapons were not paid for. They took them from police buildings.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#9
Maybe they didn't want to publish something they have no evidence for, being that the public
sabrina 1
May 2014
#26
The entire f#ckin articles a lie. The NYT reporters never said there weren't any Russians in
okaawhatever
May 2014
#37
Well, there are no supporters of Russian Interference here and from interviews in the world wide
sabrina 1
May 2014
#29
Ukraine doesn't want to hold the elections that Ukraine itself had scheduled?
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#30
When was there an election? There was coup and a president was installed by a small fraction of
sabrina 1
May 2014
#34
All of the individuals in the Ukrainian government were elected members of Parliament.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#35
Let them hold a real election of all those in the 'interim' govt. That is the ONLY way
sabrina 1
May 2014
#41
It's not the truth. If you'd bother to read the NYT article, you'd realize they never said there
okaawhatever
May 2014
#38
Nothing in that RT article is false, so I don't see the spin you're referring to.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#13
You do know that presidential elections are scheduled this month, right?
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#14
I'm sorry, when was there an election held? When did the people vote for the current regime?
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#16
The interim president and prime minister were not elected by the people.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#20
If Right Sector thugs are still attacking and intimidating people, yes.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#27
Right Sector spearheaded the coup. They are a major element in the goings-on in Ukraine.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#36
You can choose to ignore the neo-Nazis in the interim government all you want.
PoliticalPothead
May 2014
#44
There was no election in Ukraine. And now nearly half the country does not accept the
sabrina 1
May 2014
#32
The person you responded to is new here. Look at their recs and their posts and tell me if you think
okaawhatever
May 2014
#39
"...does not preclude Russian military intermingling and supplying these groups."
Comrade Grumpy
May 2014
#15
What's false in that article? We know we are supposed to be exposed to the 'Al Jazeera' treatment
sabrina 1
May 2014
#31
GrahamWP_UK suggested that pro-unity protesters should have expected to be attacked by pro-russians
penultimate
May 2014
#47
RT has several war correspondents on the ground in Ukraine. Not just one. You might not want to
sabrina 1
May 2014
#50
Nothing that RT has put forward has indicated it is an objective news source.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#55
Uncritical use of the phrase "self-defense forces" makes me question the neutrality and reliability.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2014
#19
And an hour after shooting that video, Simon Ostrovsky was seized and kept in a basement for 4 days
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#56