Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This thing with Cliven Bundy is not going to end well. [View all]951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)152. It is very remote if you actually look at the map and they "kicked" the media out long ago
And apparently they can set up checkpoints for the nearby town and law enforcement does nothing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He needs to crawl back in the rat hole he escaped. He still owes the grazing fees.
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#1
Some people have to be slapped to the ground before they get a grasp of what assholes they are. In
RKP5637
May 2014
#3
I know that part of the country and its rather remote from necessities especially gas
Cleita
May 2014
#9
What property? The property for which Bundy is in arrears for grazing fees?
KittyWampus
May 2014
#38
What about that video of one of the mooch militia blocking a TV news crew and responding,
tblue37
May 2014
#52
You make a very good point, as usual! Confrontation might well galvanize them and casual
RKP5637
May 2014
#42
My observation over the years in the US is often the assholes and wackos get a free pass, but
RKP5637
May 2014
#59
Yeah, because military weapons technology hasn't progressed since the 1780's.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#97
See, the whole 'frozen accounts' thing or auctions and whatnot? Seems perfectly fine.
Shandris
May 2014
#126
There are court orders for Bundy to pay for use of the federal lands,
No Vested Interest
May 2014
#18
so, you're in the club where people with guns can flaunt Federal Law blatantly over many years?
KittyWampus
May 2014
#39
Occupy for the most part placed itself in areas that are, under our First Amendment,
JDPriestly
May 2014
#94
It has nothing to do with finances except that the federal government has a right to claim
JDPriestly
May 2014
#116
But Bundy is still allowing his cattle to feed on federal land without a permit.
JDPriestly
May 2014
#115
I remember seeing several posts about these checkpoints, but last time I knew of...
Shandris
May 2014
#101
While I agree that a majority of RW talk is bullshit, only an idealogue thinks they know...
Shandris
May 2014
#102
The evolutionists are right. And those that believe the planet is about 4.3 billion years old.....
Fred Sanders
May 2014
#114
LOL. Well duh! But I wouldn't call that a political belief; there are RW'ers who believe in...
Shandris
May 2014
#117
There's conflicting narratives of everything when there's Faux News and Limbaugh around.
cui bono
May 2014
#134
They can't spot a high flying drone, and they sure as hell won't spot one at night.
MADem
May 2014
#13
If someone wants to do meth and young girls there are a million other better places to do it.
former9thward
May 2014
#31
if these racist scum perceive what they're doing as "right" that is absolutely their problem
KittyWampus
May 2014
#41
No, this is the perfect place for the deranged nazi pedo-meth militia types. They love remote areas
951-Riverside
May 2014
#137
It is very remote if you actually look at the map and they "kicked" the media out long ago
951-Riverside
May 2014
#152
They are the real "moochers" the GOP talks about. Stop all Fed benefit checks. See how that goes.
kelliekat44
May 2014
#26
did Occupy have guns aimed at other people? Was Occupy out in the middle of desert?
KittyWampus
May 2014
#43
I brought Occupy into the conversation because the same media points were made then.
former9thward
May 2014
#68
You can have an opinion but you cannot change facts. When you try and someone calls you on it you
jwirr
May 2014
#65
I was there in the 60s also and yes we were peacefully protesting like Occupy did. That is not what
jwirr
May 2014
#71
Those incidents were mainly at the end of the moverment. As to the early violence especially
jwirr
May 2014
#75
Yeah, but all those assault rifles, pistols, ammo and camouflage cost shitloads of money.
Paladin
May 2014
#46
To the contrary: I honestly want you to engage in as much discussion as you want. (nt)
Paladin
May 2014
#76
Yes, but OWS didn't call people on welfare losers while being on welfare themselves.
chrisa
May 2014
#149
The Occupy folks didn't spend their lives banging on about "freeloaders" and "takers".
Arkana
May 2014
#151
Need to leak aerial shots of them standing around out there to totally freak them out....
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2014
#16
that is actually a good idea. Psychological warfare. Maybe they'd start shooting themselves
KittyWampus
May 2014
#48
And the half-erased word "informant" with a vaguely directed arrow ... nt
eppur_se_muova
May 2014
#62
Remote control planes flying over the check points would probably re-enforce the rumors.
Gore1FL
May 2014
#91
Cut the network feeds, leave the area, keep Bundy off of FOX and this incident
Thinkingabout
May 2014
#107
Give me two head of cattle, four melons and three kids--and make sure the kids are fresh this time
pinboy3niner
May 2014
#135